Change search
Link to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Larsson, Kerstin ElisabethORCID iD iconorcid.org/0000-0003-0427-1687
Alternative names
Publications (2 of 2) Show all publications
Larson, N. & Larsson, K. E. (2024). Differences in Swedish and Norwegian pre-service teachers’ explanations of solutions of linear equations. Nordic Journal of STEM Education, 8(2), 137-153
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Differences in Swedish and Norwegian pre-service teachers’ explanations of solutions of linear equations
2024 (English)In: Nordic Journal of STEM Education, ISSN 2535-4574, Vol. 8, no 2, p. 137-153Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Solving linear equations is a cornerstone in the learning of algebra. There are two main strategies for solving a linear equation, ‘swap sides swap signs’ (SSSS) and ‘do the same to both sides’ (DSBS). While SSSS can often be more efficient for solving equations, DSBS has been shown to better promote the learning of algebra. Thus, the preference of SSSS or DSBS might depend on the purpose of solving equations. Since both approaches are common, mathematics teachers, and thus also pre-service teachers (PSTs), must be familiar with both SSSS and DSBS. This study draws on data from 161 Swedish and 146 Norwegian PSTs. They were given a correct but short and unannotated solution to the linear equation x + 5 = 4x − 1. The PSTs were invited to explain the provided solution for a fictive friend. Of the Norwegian PSTs, 2/3 explained the additive steps in the solution by SSSS, while only 1/3 of the Swedish PSTs applied SSSS. Consequently, DSBS was more frequent among the Swedish PSTs regarding the additive steps. However, in the final, multiplicative step, 3/4 of the Norwegian PSTs invoked DSBS. On the contrary, among the Swedish PSTs, the proportion applying DSBS for the multiplicative step decreased, and it was common to provide an incomplete explanation of the final operation. We also analysed how mathematics textbooks for secondary school presented how to solve linear equations. In Sweden, all textbooks utilised DSBS through the whole solution for all years in secondary school. This also applied for Norwegian textbooks for the first two years of lower secondary school. However, in last year of lower secondary school, they changed their approach and promoted an SSSS strategy in additive steps, while DSBS was still suggested for multiplicative steps. This might explain the differences between the two countries regarding the PSTs’ preferences of solution strategies. We suggest that these results can be useful for teacher education, since increased awareness of PSTs’ pre-knowledge is beneficial to support their development of teaching linear equations. 

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
NTNU Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 2024
National Category
Didactics
Research subject
Mathematics and Science Education
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:ltu:diva-110603 (URN)10.5324/njsteme.v8i2.4074 (DOI)
Note

Validerad;2024;Nivå 1;2024-10-30 (joosat);

Full text: CC BY license

Available from: 2024-10-30 Created: 2024-10-30 Last updated: 2024-10-30Bibliographically approved
Lundkvist, M. & Larsson, K. E. (2024). When implementing the method Thinking classroom, the didactical contract is hard to break. In: Johan Häggström, Cecilia Kilhamn, Linda Mattsson, Hanna Palmér, Miguel Perez, Kerstin Pettersson, Ann-Sofi Röj-Lindberg, Anna Teledahl (Ed.), Proceedings of MADIF 14 The fourteenth research conference of the Swedish Society for Research in Mathematics Education: . Paper presented at The fourteenth research conference of the Swedish Society for Research in Mathematics Education (MADIF 14), Örebro, March 19–20, 2024 (pp. 73-83). Svensk förening för MatematikDidaktisk Forskning - SMDF, 18
Open this publication in new window or tab >>When implementing the method Thinking classroom, the didactical contract is hard to break
2024 (English)In: Proceedings of MADIF 14 The fourteenth research conference of the Swedish Society for Research in Mathematics Education / [ed] Johan Häggström, Cecilia Kilhamn, Linda Mattsson, Hanna Palmér, Miguel Perez, Kerstin Pettersson, Ann-Sofi Röj-Lindberg, Anna Teledahl, Svensk förening för MatematikDidaktisk Forskning - SMDF, 2024, Vol. 18, p. 73-83Conference paper, Published paper (Refereed)
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Svensk förening för MatematikDidaktisk Forskning - SMDF, 2024
Series
Skrifter från Svensk Förening för MatematikDidaktisk Forskning, ISSN 1651-3274 ; 18
National Category
Didactics
Research subject
Mathematics and Science Education
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:ltu:diva-105875 (URN)
Conference
The fourteenth research conference of the Swedish Society for Research in Mathematics Education (MADIF 14), Örebro, March 19–20, 2024
Note

ISBN for host publication: 978-91-984024-7-6

Available from: 2024-06-10 Created: 2024-06-10 Last updated: 2024-06-10Bibliographically approved
Organisations
Identifiers
ORCID iD: ORCID iD iconorcid.org/0000-0003-0427-1687

Search in DiVA

Show all publications