Open this publication in new window or tab >> Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Department of Green Chemistry and Technology, Sustainable Systems Engineering Group (STEN), Ghent University, Coupure Links 653, Blok B – 5th floor, Ghent, Belgium.
Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Department of Green Chemistry and Technology, Sustainable Systems Engineering Group (STEN), Ghent University, Coupure Links 653, Blok B – 5th floor, Ghent, Belgium.
European Association of Mining Industries, Metal Ores and Industrial Minerals (Euromines), Avenue de Tervueren, 168, box 15, 1150, Brussels, Belgium.
Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Department of Green Chemistry and Technology, Sustainable Systems Engineering Group (STEN), Ghent University, Coupure Links 653, Blok B – 5th floor, Ghent, Belgium.
Luleå University of Technology, Department of Civil, Environmental and Natural Resources Engineering, Geosciences and Environmental Engineering.
Luleå University of Technology, Department of Civil, Environmental and Natural Resources Engineering, Geosciences and Environmental Engineering.
Tecnalia Research & Innovation, C/Geldo, Edificio 700 (Parque Tecnológico de Bizkaia), 48160, Derio, Bizkaia, Spain.
Tecnalia Research & Innovation, C/Geldo, Edificio 700 (Parque Tecnológico de Bizkaia), 48160, Derio, Bizkaia, Spain.
Boliden Mineral AB, Kontorsvägen 1, SE-936 81, Boliden, Sweden.
Cobre las Cruces, S.A., Carretera SE-3410 – Km. 4,100, 418 60, Sevilla, Gerena, Spain.
Cobre las Cruces, S.A., Carretera SE-3410 – Km. 4,100, 418 60, Sevilla, Gerena, Spain.
Cobre las Cruces, S.A., Carretera SE-3410 – Km. 4,100, 418 60, Sevilla, Gerena, Spain.
Show others...
2020 (English) In: The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, ISSN 0948-3349, E-ISSN 1614-7502, Vol. 25, no 11, p. 2255-2273Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en] Purpose
The methods for assessing the impact of using abiotic resources in life cycle assessment (LCA) have always been heavily debated. One of the main reasons for this is the lack of a common understanding of the problem related to resource use. This article reports the results of an effort to reach such common understanding between different stakeholder groups and the LCA community. For this, a top-down approach was applied.
Methods
To guide the process, a four-level top-down framework was used to (1) demarcate the problem that needs to be assessed, (2) translate this into a modeling concept, (3) derive mathematical equations and fill these with data necessary to calculate the characterization factors, and (4) align the system boundaries and assumptions that are made in the life cycle impact assessment (LCIA) model and the life cycle inventory (LCI) model.
Results
We started from the following definition of the problem of using resources: the decrease of accessibility on a global level of primary and/or secondary elements over the very long term or short term due to the net result of compromising actions. The system model distinguishes accessible and inaccessible stocks in both the environment and the technosphere. Human actions can compromise the accessible stock through environmental dissipation, technosphere hibernation, and occupation in use or through exploration. As a basis for impact assessment , we propose two parameters: the global change in accessible stock as a net result of the compromising actions and the global amount of the accessible stock. We propose three impact categories for the use of elements: environmental dissipation, technosphere hibernation, and occupation in use, with associated characterization equations for two different time horizons. Finally, preliminary characterization factors are derived and applied in a simple illustrative case study for environmental dissipation.
Conclusions
Due to data constraints, at this moment, only characterization factors for “dissipation to the environment” over a very-long-term time horizon could be elaborated. The case study shows that the calculation of impact scores might be hampered by insufficient LCI data. Most presently available LCI databases are far from complete in registering the flows necessary to assess the impacts on the accessibility of elements. While applying the framework, various choices are made that could plausibly be made differently. We invite our peers to also use this top-down framework when challenging our choices and elaborate that into a consistent set of choices and assumptions when developing LCIA methods.
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Cham, Switzerland: Springer Nature, 2020
Keywords Abiotic resources, Elements, Configurations, Minerals, Metals, Life cycle impact assessment, System model, Characterization model, Characterization factor, Dissipation
National Category
Geology
Research subject
Ore Geology
Identifiers urn:nbn:se:ltu:diva-80763 (URN) 10.1007/s11367-020-01819-4 (DOI) 000568467800001 () 2-s2.0-85090798587 (Scopus ID)
Note Validerad;2020;Nivå 2;2020-11-10 (alebob)
2020-09-112020-09-112020-11-10 Bibliographically approved