Open this publication in new window or tab >>Show others...
2021 (English)In: Journal of Environmental Management, ISSN 0301-4797, E-ISSN 1095-8630, Vol. 297, article id 113375Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]
This study evaluates the operational status of twenty-six biofilter facilities across nine cities in Sweden, with respect to their functional design criteria, engineered design features (filter media composition, hydraulic conductivity, and drawdown time), and includes a visual inspection of the biofilter components (pre-treatment, in/outlet structures, filter media, and vegetation). These indicators were used to examine the performance level of each biofilter in achieving their design objectives set by the operators. Furthermore, it was investigated whether the biofilter facilities had been properly maintained to meet the objectives. Results indicate that the soil media used was consistent with respect to percentage sand, fines, and organic matter and comparable to design recommendations used by municipalities in other countries. The field-tested hydraulic conductivity for the biofilters ranged from 30 to 962 mm/h. This range of values, along with noticeable sediment accumulation within the biofilter indicate that not all the sites were operating optimally. Pre-treatment stages in poor condition with high volumes of sediment and litter accumulation were the primary causes for, and indicators of, low hydraulic conductivity rates. The ponding volume calculations revealed that at least 40 % of facilities did not have enough capacity to retain every-day and/or design rainfall due to design and/or construction flaws. These analyses raise concerns that, for a considerable number of the biofilters surveyed, water retention and flood protection identified by operators as prioritised objectives are not being met. This raises significant concerns about the functionality of biofilter in practice. Finally, some suggestions are given for tackling the design and maintenance problems discovered.
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier, 2021
Keywords
Bioretention, Operation & maintenance, Stormwater control measures (SCMs), Urban stormwater management, Asset management
National Category
Environmental Engineering Water Engineering
Research subject
Urban Water Engineering; Centre - Centre for Stormwater Management (DRIZZLE)
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:ltu:diva-86574 (URN)10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113375 (DOI)000691262000008 ()34325375 (PubMedID)2-s2.0-85111225335 (Scopus ID)
Funder
Vinnova, 2016-02518; 2016-05176Swedish Research Council Formas, 2016-20074
Note
Validerad;2021;Nivå 2;2021-08-16 (alebob)
2021-08-122021-08-122023-09-05Bibliographically approved