Change search
Link to record
Permanent link

Direct link
BETA
Publications (1 of 1) Show all publications
Pettersson, M., van Rijswick, M., Suykens, C., Alexander, M., Ek, K. & Priest, S. (2017). Assessing the legitimacy of flood risk governance arrangements in Europe: insights from intra-country evaluations. Water international, 42(8), 929-944
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Assessing the legitimacy of flood risk governance arrangements in Europe: insights from intra-country evaluations
Show others...
2017 (English)In: Water international, ISSN 0250-8060, E-ISSN 1941-1707, Vol. 42, no 8, p. 929-944Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Legitimacy has received comparatively less attention than societal resilience in the context of flooding, thus methods for assessing and monitoring the legitimacy of flood risk governance arrangements are noticeably lacking. This study attempts to address this gap by assessing the legitimacy of flood risk governance arrangements in six European countries through cross-disciplinary and comparative research methods. On the basis of this assessment, recommendations to enhance the legitimacy of flood risk governance in Europe are presented.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Taylor & Francis, 2017
Keywords
Legitimacy, flood risk governance, comparative study, governance, Europe
National Category
Law Law (excluding Law and Society) Economics
Research subject
Law; Economics
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:ltu:diva-66639 (URN)10.1080/02508060.2017.1393716 (DOI)000422621600001 ()
Note

Validerad;2018;Nivå 2;2017-12-18 (andbra)

Available from: 2017-11-20 Created: 2017-11-20 Last updated: 2019-09-12Bibliographically approved
Identifiers
ORCID iD: ORCID iD iconorcid.org/0000-0003-3147-085x

Search in DiVA

Show all publications