Endre søk
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
The Rationale for the Duty to Consult Indigenous Peoples: Comparative Reflections from Nordic and Canadian Legal Contexts
Luleå tekniska universitet, Institutionen för ekonomi, teknik och samhälle, Samhällsvetenskap.ORCID-id: 0000-0001-6869-5193
2018 (engelsk)Inngår i: Arctic Review on Law and Politics, ISSN 1891-6252, E-ISSN 2387-4562, Vol. 9, s. 25-43Artikkel i tidsskrift (Fagfellevurdert) Published
Abstract [en]

Although the standard of consulting Indigenous peoples in decisions affecting them is well rooted internationally as well as in national legal systems, different views and patterns of problems are associated with the concept and its practice. This paper briefly analyses and contrasts the duty to consult Indigenous peoples through a comparison of the three Nordic countries Norway, Finland and Sweden, and Canada. Based on domestic legal sources, the focus of the paper is to explore the legal foundation that has given rise to the specific set of rules for the duty to consult, that is, the rationale behind the evolving of the rules. The first finding is that the rules differ among the three Nordic countries, with Sweden being the only country that lacks specific rules. Secondly, whereas Canada has developed its own duty to consult primarily through domestic case law, in the Nordic countries, duty to consult is related to international law obligations. Consultation duties that have evolved from domestic law may be easier to accept than “foreign” regulations imposed on national legal systems. This could explain the reluctance among the Nordic States to accept specific consultations with the Sami Parliament and other Sami groups, particularly in Sweden.

sted, utgiver, år, opplag, sider
Cappelen Damm Akademisk, 2018. Vol. 9, s. 25-43
Emneord [en]
consultation, participation, Indigenous rights, Sami rights, Aboriginal rights, Nordic law, Canadian law
HSV kategori
Forskningsprogram
Rättsvetenskap
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:ltu:diva-68049DOI: 10.23865/arctic.v9.729OAI: oai:DiVA.org:ltu-68049DiVA, id: diva2:1192869
Merknad

Validerad;2018;Nivå 2;2018-03-26 (rokbeg)

Tilgjengelig fra: 2018-03-23 Laget: 2018-03-23 Sist oppdatert: 2019-09-13bibliografisk kontrollert

Open Access i DiVA

fulltext(1757 kB)59 nedlastinger
Filinformasjon
Fil FULLTEXT01.pdfFilstørrelse 1757 kBChecksum SHA-512
55b4310be14a7a69af6083eb322c464d93df83d2b13ca0570470b010c56afe3720b682b19235fe94a719a54c7854a4a82c3d9484c3151dfde6468fb84bb43037
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Andre lenker

Forlagets fullteksthttps://arcticreview.no/index.php/arctic/article/view/729

Søk i DiVA

Av forfatter/redaktør
Allard, Christina
Av organisasjonen
I samme tidsskrift
Arctic Review on Law and Politics

Søk utenfor DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Totalt: 59 nedlastinger
Antall nedlastinger er summen av alle nedlastinger av alle fulltekster. Det kan for eksempel være tidligere versjoner som er ikke lenger tilgjengelige

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric

doi
urn-nbn
Totalt: 262 treff
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf