Endre søk
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Reducing US Coal Emissions Can Boost Employment
Ecosystems Services and Management Program (ESM), International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA) School of Business Society and Engineering, Mälardalen University.
Ecosystems Services and Management Program (ESM), International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA).
Ecosystems Services and Management Program (ESM), International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA).
Ecosystems Services and Management Program (ESM), International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA); Working Group Sustainable Resource Management and Global Change, Mercator Research Institute on Global Commons and Climate Change.
Vise andre og tillknytning
2018 (engelsk)Inngår i: Joule, ISSN 2542-4351, Vol. 2, nr 12, s. 2633-2648Artikkel i tidsskrift (Fagfellevurdert) Published
Abstract [en]

Concerns have been voiced that implementing climate change mitigation measures could come at the cost of employment, especially in the context of the US coal sector. However, repurposing US coal plants presents an opportunity to address emission mitigation and job creation, if the right technology change is adopted. In this study, the transformation of the US coal sector until 2050 is modeled to achieve ambitious climate targets. Results show that the cost-optimal strategy for meeting 2050 emission reductions consistent with 2°C stabilization pathways is through the early deployment of BECCS and by replacing 50% of aging coal plants with natural gas plants. This strategy addresses the concerns surrounding employment for coal workers by retaining 40,000 jobs, and creating 22,000 additional jobs by mid-century. Climate change mitigation does not have to come at the cost of employment, and policymakers could seek to take advantage of the social co-benefits of mitigation.

sted, utgiver, år, opplag, sider
Elsevier, 2018. Vol. 2, nr 12, s. 2633-2648
HSV kategori
Forskningsprogram
Energiteknik
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:ltu:diva-71675DOI: 10.1016/j.joule.2018.10.004ISI: 000453896100016Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85059616029OAI: oai:DiVA.org:ltu-71675DiVA, id: diva2:1264396
Forskningsfinansiär
Bio4Energy
Merknad

Validerad;2019;Nivå 2;2019-01-30 (inah)

Tilgjengelig fra: 2018-11-20 Laget: 2018-11-20 Sist oppdatert: 2019-01-30bibliografisk kontrollert

Open Access i DiVA

Fulltekst mangler i DiVA

Andre lenker

Forlagets fulltekstScopus

Personposter BETA

Lundgren, Joakim

Søk i DiVA

Av forfatter/redaktør
Wetterlund, ElisabethLundgren, Joakim
Av organisasjonen

Søk utenfor DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric

doi
urn-nbn
Totalt: 33 treff
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf