System disruptions
We are currently experiencing disruptions on the search portals due to high traffic. We are working to resolve the issue, you may temporarily encounter an error message.
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Further development of the reflective practice questionnaire
Psychology, Edith Cowan University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
Medical Humanities, Rocky Vista University, Denver, Colorado, United States of America.
Medical Humanities, Rocky Vista University, Denver, Colorado, United States of America.
Pharmacy, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Show others and affiliations
2024 (English)In: PeerJ, E-ISSN 2167-8359, Vol. 12, article id e16879Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background This article provides an update of the Reflective Practice Questionnaire (RPQ). The original RPQ consisted of 40-items with 10-sub-scales. In this article, the RPQ is streamlined into a 10-item single reflective practice construct, and a 30-item extended version that includes additional sub-scales of confidence, uncertainty/stress, and work satisfaction.

Methods A total of 501 university students filled out an online questionnaire that contained the original Reflective Practice Questionnaire, and two general measures of reflection: The Self-Reflection and Insight Scale, and the Rumination-Reflection Questionnaire.

Results Based on factor analysis, the RPQ was streamlined into a brief 10-item version, and an extended 30-item version. Small positive correlations were found between the RPQ reflective practice measure and the two measures of general reflection, providing discriminant validity evidence for the RPQ. The RPQ was found to be sensitive to differences among industries, whereas the general measures of reflection were not. Average reflective practice scores were higher for health and education industries compared to retail and food/accommodation industries.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
PeerJ Inc. , 2024. Vol. 12, article id e16879
Keywords [en]
Reflective practice, Allied health professions, Education, Self-report measurement, Factor analysis, Self reflection, Self confidence, Stress, Uncertainty, Work satisfaction
National Category
Other Medical Sciences not elsewhere specified
Research subject
Nursing
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:ltu:diva-104225DOI: 10.7717/peerj.16879ISI: 001159741800001PubMedID: 38344297Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85185181647OAI: oai:DiVA.org:ltu-104225DiVA, id: diva2:1836112
Note

Validerad;2024;Nivå 2;2024-04-02 (signyg);

Full text license: CC BY

Available from: 2024-02-08 Created: 2024-02-08 Last updated: 2024-08-22Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(1018 kB)46 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 1018 kBChecksum SHA-512
b48414ceed91a8555d9b683f90041ed37c1133e47822ff2717b43eb269257eaa6e42a0bc8569cb889edb3ce6a56863a10b53822244734c96e2e1c14884c5e486
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Gabrielsson, SebastianRysst Gustafsson, Silje

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Gabrielsson, SebastianRysst Gustafsson, Silje
By organisation
Nursing and Medical Technology
In the same journal
PeerJ
Other Medical Sciences not elsewhere specified

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 46 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 124 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf