Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
False memory-guided eye movements: insights from a DRM-Saccade paradigm
Department of Psychology, City, University of London, London, UK.
Department of Psychology, Edge Hill University, Ormskirk, UK.
Institute of Health, University of Cumbria, Lancaster, UK.
Luleå University of Technology, Department of Health, Education and Technology, Health, Medicine and Rehabilitation. School of Psychology and Humanities, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9494-1287
2024 (English)In: Memory, ISSN 0965-8211, E-ISSN 1464-0686, Vol. 32, no 2, p. 223-236Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

The Deese-Roediger and McDermott (DRM) paradigm and visually guided saccade tasks are both prominent research tools in their own right. This study introduces a novel DRM-Saccade paradigm, merging both methodologies. We used rule-based saccadic eye movements whereby participants were presented with items at test and were asked to make a saccade to the left or right of the item to denote a recognition or non-recognition decision. We measured old/new recognition decisions and saccadic latencies. Experiment 1 used a pro/anti saccade task to a single target. We found slower saccadic latencies for correct rejection of critical lures, but no latency difference between correct recognition of studied items and false recognition of critical lures. Experiment 2 used a two-target saccade task and also measured corrective saccades. Findings corroborated those from Experiment 1. Participants adjusted their initial decisions to increase accurate recognition of studied items and rejection of unrelated lures but there were no such corrections for critical lures. We argue that rapid saccades indicate cognitive processing driven by familiarity thresholds. These occur before slower source-monitoring is able to process any conflict. The DRM-Saccade task could effectively track real-time cognitive resource use during recognition decisions.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Taylor & Francis , 2024. Vol. 32, no 2, p. 223-236
Keywords [en]
DRM paradigm, false memory, eye saccades, Recognition accuracy
National Category
Applied Psychology
Research subject
Psychology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:ltu:diva-104287DOI: 10.1080/09658211.2024.2307921ISI: 001152518000001PubMedID: 38285521Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85183929054OAI: oai:DiVA.org:ltu-104287DiVA, id: diva2:1837885
Note

Validerad;2024;Nivå 2;2024-03-25 (joosat);

Full text license: CC BY-NC-ND

Available from: 2024-02-15 Created: 2024-02-15 Last updated: 2024-03-25Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(1588 kB)11 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 1588 kBChecksum SHA-512
37a2a165b793b5aa38a325816c2316bf05951a78db963a48769d340e4c51a5798c29836704d302b4871dddc691fce0f64a1ac43a8b6fd3b12da0350c2294a77d
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Marsh, John Everett

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Marsh, John Everett
By organisation
Health, Medicine and Rehabilitation
In the same journal
Memory
Applied Psychology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 11 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 24 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf