Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
An evaluation of different models for prediction of elastic properties of woven composites
Luleå University of Technology, Department of Engineering Sciences and Mathematics, Mathematical Science.
Luleå tekniska universitet.
Luleå University of Technology, Department of Engineering Sciences and Mathematics, Material Science.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9649-8621
2000 (English)In: Composites Part B: Engineering, ISSN 1359-8368, E-ISSN 1879-1069, Vol. 31, no 1, p. 7-20Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

A critical analysis of two simple and convenient analytical models for calculation of elastic properties of woven fabric composites is performed. Predictions of these models are compared with results obtained using the method of reiterated homogenization and with experimental data for plain weave glass fiber and carbon fiber polyester composites. Three different scales are identified in the analysis. The first scale predictions, which are the tow properties (obtained by applying Hashin's concentric cylinder model, the Halpin-Tsai expressions or mathematical homogenization technique), are the most critical because they form the input information for woven composite modeling. It appears that the uncertainty in this information causes larger differences in predictions than the deviations between models of different degree of accuracy. This fact sets limits on the required accuracy of the models. Model comparisons reveal that the woven compoiste model based on isostrain assumption in the compoiste plane and isostress assumption for out-of-plane components is in very good agreement with both experimental data and the reiterated homogenization method, whereas the modified mosaic parallel model fails to describe composites with large interlaced regions.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2000. Vol. 31, no 1, p. 7-20
National Category
Mathematical Analysis Composite Science and Engineering
Research subject
Mathematics; Polymeric Composite Materials
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:ltu:diva-3748DOI: 10.1016/S1359-8368(99)00061-XISI: 000086158800002Local ID: 19463550-b1ff-11db-bf9d-000ea68e967bOAI: oai:DiVA.org:ltu-3748DiVA, id: diva2:976608
Note
Validerad; 2000; 20070105 (ysko)Available from: 2016-09-29 Created: 2016-09-29 Last updated: 2018-07-10Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full text

Authority records BETA

Byström, JohanVarna, Janis

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Byström, JohanVarna, Janis
By organisation
Mathematical ScienceMaterial Science
In the same journal
Composites Part B: Engineering
Mathematical AnalysisComposite Science and Engineering

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 88 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf