Endre søk
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Prognostic validity of the Timed Up-and-Go test: a modified Get-Up-and-Go test, staff's global judgement and fall history in evaluating fall risk in residential care facilities
Umeå University, Department of Community Medicine and Rehabilitation, Physiotherapy.
Department of Community Medicine and Rehabilitation, Geriatric Medicine, Umeå university.
Luleå tekniska universitet, Institutionen för hälsovetenskap, Hälsa och rehabilitering.
Umeå University, Department of Community Medicine and Rehabilitation, Physiotherapy.
Vise andre og tillknytning
2008 (engelsk)Inngår i: Age and Ageing, ISSN 0002-0729, E-ISSN 1468-2834, Vol. 37, nr 4, s. 442-448Artikkel i tidsskrift (Fagfellevurdert) Published
Abstract [en]

Objectives: to evaluate and compare the prognostic validity relative to falls of the Timed Up-and-Go test (TUG), a modified Get-Up-and-Go test (GUG-m), staff's judgement of global rating of fall risk (GLORF) and fall history among frail older people. Design: cohort study, 6-month prospective follow-up for falls. Participants: 183 frail persons living in residential care facilities in Sweden, mean age 84 years, 73% women. Methods: the occurrence of falls during the follow-up period were compared to the following assessments at baseline: the TUG at normal speed; the GUG-m, a rating of fall risk scored from 1 (no risk) to 5 (very high risk); the GLORF, staff's rating of fall risk as 'high' or 'low'; a history of falls in the previous 6 months. These assessment tools were evaluated using sensitivity, specificity and positive and negative likelihood ratios (LR+ to rule in and LR- to rule out a high fall risk). Results: 53% of the participants fell at least once. Various cut-off values of the TUG (12, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40 s) and the GUG-m showed LR+ between 0.9 and 2.6 and LR- between 0.1 and 1.0. The GLORF showed an LR+ of 2.8 and an LR- of 0.6 and fall history showed an LR+ of 2.4 and an LR- of 0.6. Conclusions: in this population of frail older people, staff judgement of their residents' fall risk as well as previous falls both appear superior to the performance-based measures TUG and GUG-m in ruling in a high fall risk. A TUG score of less than 15 s gives guidance in ruling out a high fall risk but insufficient information in ruling in such a risk. The grading of fall risk by GUG-m appears of very limited value.

sted, utgiver, år, opplag, sider
2008. Vol. 37, nr 4, s. 442-448
HSV kategori
Forskningsprogram
Sjukgymnastik
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:ltu:diva-6248DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afn101ISI: 000257238000016PubMedID: 18515291Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-47049113778Lokal ID: 472dfd70-9b9d-11dd-94de-000ea68e967bOAI: oai:DiVA.org:ltu-6248DiVA, id: diva2:979125
Merknad
Validerad; 2008; 20081016 (eriros)Tilgjengelig fra: 2016-09-29 Laget: 2016-09-29 Sist oppdatert: 2023-05-08bibliografisk kontrollert

Open Access i DiVA

Fulltekst mangler i DiVA

Andre lenker

Forlagets fulltekstPubMedScopus

Person

Rosendahl, Erik

Søk i DiVA

Av forfatter/redaktør
Rosendahl, Erik
Av organisasjonen
I samme tidsskrift
Age and Ageing

Søk utenfor DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Totalt: 54 treff
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf