Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
The relation between tools used in action research and the zone of proximal development
Luleå University of Technology, Department of Arts, Communication and Education, Music and dance.
Göteborgs universitet.
2006 (English)In: Educational action research, ISSN 0965-0792, E-ISSN 1747-5074, Vol. 14, no 4, p. 547-568Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

This article describes a national school improvement project involving five compulsory schools for hard-of-hearing pupils, located in different parts of Sweden. Using action research, the teachers tried to change the communication patterns among the pupils by changing their own classroom practices, In this process the teachers tested and used different tools, such as writing, shadowing and facilitating each other, over a three-year period. The purpose of this article is to examine how tools used in action research can be used to promote learning in relation to the concept of the zone of proximal development. The theoretical framework of the study is based on action research, as a collaborative way of creating knowledge, and on sociocultural learning theories. The basic assumption is that teachers, by using different tools, also challenge each other's learning. The results show the importance of internalising tools that become owned by individuals or communities of practise. To be able to assume an active role in the zone of proximal development, and to produce knowledge collaboratively, a meaning-making process was needed. It was found that this could be realised if the participants had an awareness of how to function as a critical friend among colleagues. Furthermore, the results revealed that, by using different tools, different voices can be heard. Three categories of voices were identified.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2006. Vol. 14, no 4, p. 547-568
National Category
Pedagogy
Research subject
Music Education
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:ltu:diva-8153DOI: 10.1080/09650790600975791ISI: 000210917200008Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-61449165622Local ID: 6a01bc00-fb22-11db-b816-000ea68e967bOAI: oai:DiVA.org:ltu-8153DiVA, id: diva2:981044
Note

Validerad; 2006; 20070505 (ysko)

Available from: 2016-09-29 Created: 2016-09-29 Last updated: 2025-02-05Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Wennergren, Ann-Christine

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Wennergren, Ann-Christine
By organisation
Music and dance
In the same journal
Educational action research
Pedagogy

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 28 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf