Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
International Industry Practice on Power Quality Monitoring
School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, The University of Manchester.
Institute of Electrical Power Systems and High Voltage Engineering, Technische Universitaet Dresden.
National Grid, Warwick Technology Park, Warwick.
Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI), Boulder, CO.
Show others and affiliations
2014 (English)In: IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, ISSN 0885-8977, E-ISSN 1937-4208, Vol. 29, no 2, p. 934-941Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Monitoring of voltages and currents at system buses gives the network operators information about the performance of their network, both for the system as a whole and for individual locations and customers. There is also demand from the customers and the regulatory agencies to provide information on the actual power-quality (PQ) level. Developments in enabling technology have made it possible to monitor at a large scale and to record virtually any PQ parameter of interest. While many network operators are installing monitoring equipment and while more and more monitors are available, there is a lack of knowledge and agreement on a number of aspects of the monitoring process and on processing the recorded data. As a response to this lack of uniformity in approach, data acquisition, and processing, in February 2011, CIGRE and CIRED established the Joint Working Group C4.112: “Guidelines for Power quality monitoring—measurement locations, processing and presentation of data.” In order to identify the current international industry practice on PQ monitoring, the group carried out a survey in 43 countries across the world. This paper summarizes the key findings from 114 responses to the questionnaire and identifies prevalent industrial practice in PQ monitoring around the world.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2014. Vol. 29, no 2, p. 934-941
National Category
Other Electrical Engineering, Electronic Engineering, Information Engineering
Research subject
Electric Power Engineering
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:ltu:diva-10391DOI: 10.1109/TPWRD.2013.2283143ISI: 000333523000053Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-84897916253Local ID: 9328936f-d1bb-47fd-9f97-986dc2aea71bOAI: oai:DiVA.org:ltu-10391DiVA, id: diva2:983336
Note
Validerad; 2014; 20131114 (matbol)Available from: 2016-09-29 Created: 2016-09-29 Last updated: 2018-07-10Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records BETA

Bollen, Math

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Bollen, Math
By organisation
Energy Science
In the same journal
IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery
Other Electrical Engineering, Electronic Engineering, Information Engineering

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 20 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf