Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Hybrid models for PHM deployment techniques in railway
Luleå University of Technology, Department of Civil, Environmental and Natural Resources Engineering, Operation, Maintenance and Acoustics.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4107-0991
Luleå University of Technology, Department of Civil, Environmental and Natural Resources Engineering, Operation, Maintenance and Acoustics.
Luleå University of Technology, Department of Civil, Environmental and Natural Resources Engineering, Operation, Maintenance and Acoustics.
Luleå University of Technology, Department of Civil, Environmental and Natural Resources Engineering, Operation, Maintenance and Acoustics.
Show others and affiliations
2013 (English)In: 10th International Conference on Condition Monitoring and Machinery Failure Prevention Technologies 2013, CM 2013 and MFPT 2013, 2013, Vol. 2, p. 1047-1056Conference paper, Published paper (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

Many railway assets exhibit increasing wear and tear of equipment during operation. Prognostics are viewed as an add-on capability to diagnosis; they assess the current health of a system and predict its remaining life based on features that capture the gradual degradation in the operational capabilities of a system. Prognostics are critical to improve safety, plan successful missions, schedule maintenance, reduce maintenance cost and down time. Unlike fault diagnosis, prognosis is a relatively new area and became an important part of Condition-based Maintenance (CBM) of systems. Currently, there are many prognostic techniques; their usage must be tuned for each application. The prognostic methods can be classified as being associated with one or more of the following two approaches: data-driven and model-based. Each of these approaches has its own advantages and disadvantages, and consequently, they are often used in combination in many applications called hybrid. A hybrid model could combine some or all of model types (data-driven, and phenomenological), so that more complete information allows for more accurate recognition of the fault state. This approach is especially relevant in railway where the maintainer and operator know some of the failure mechanisms, but the complexity of the infrastructure and rolling stock is huge so no way to develop a complete model based approach that is why development of hybrid models becomes necessary to estimate RUL of railway systems in a more accurate way. The paper address this process of data aggregation into the hybrid model in order to get RUL values within logical confidence intervals so railway assets life cycle can be managed and optimized.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2013. Vol. 2, p. 1047-1056
National Category
Other Civil Engineering
Research subject
Operation and Maintenance
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:ltu:diva-26908Local ID: 02b6b94b-282d-47df-8a18-4ee14366bc9aISBN: 978-1-62993-992-6 (print)OAI: oai:DiVA.org:ltu-26908DiVA, id: diva2:1000088
Conference
International Conference on Condition Monitoring and Machinery Failure Prevention Technologies : 18/06/2013 - 20/06/2013
Note
Godkänd; 2013; 20130815 (joarch)Available from: 2016-09-30 Created: 2016-09-30 Last updated: 2017-11-25Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Galar, DiegoVillarejo, RobertoJohansson, Carl-AndersKumar, Uday
By organisation
Operation, Maintenance and Acoustics
Other Civil Engineering

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

isbn
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

isbn
urn-nbn
Total: 16 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf