Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Platform selection under performance loss constraints in optimal design of product families
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Michigan.
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Michigan.
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Michigan.
2002 (English)In: Proceedings of the 2002 ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, New York: American Society of Mechanical Engineers , 2002, Vol. 2 : 28th Design Automation Conference, p. 613-621Conference paper, Published paper (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

Designing a family of product variants that share some components usually entails a performance loss relative to the individually optimized variants due to the commonality constraints. Choosing components for sharing may depend on what performance losses can be tolerated. This article presents a methodology for making commonality decisions while controlling individual performance losses. Previous work focused on evaluating individual performance losses due to pre-specified sharing. Trade-offs were identified for different platforms (i.e., the sets of components shared among products) by means of Pareto sets. In the present work an optimal design problem is formulated to choose product components to be shared without exceeding a user-specified performance loss tolerance. This enables the designer to control trade-offs and obtain optimal product family designs for different levels of performance losses in an attempt to maximize commonality. A family of automotive side frames is used to demonstrate the approach

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
New York: American Society of Mechanical Engineers , 2002. Vol. 2 : 28th Design Automation Conference, p. 613-621
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:ltu:diva-28572DOI: 10.1115/DETC2002/DAC-34099Local ID: 2670f8ff-602e-4ba4-b3d5-6df7d3b64845ISBN: 0-7918-3622-3 (print)OAI: oai:DiVA.org:ltu-28572DiVA, id: diva2:1001772
Conference
ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences : 29/09/2002 - 02/10/2002
Note
Upprättat; 2011; 20110629 (andbra)Available from: 2016-09-30 Created: 2016-09-30 Last updated: 2017-11-25Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full text

Authority records BETA

Kokkolaras, Michael

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Kokkolaras, Michael

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
isbn
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
isbn
urn-nbn
Total: 7 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf