Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Production performances vs machine down times and buffer sizes: a case study
Narvik University College, 8505 Narvik, Norway.
Luleå University of Technology, Department of Business Administration, Technology and Social Sciences, Business Administration and Industrial Engineering.
2008 (English)In: 15th International Working Seminar on Production Economics: Pre-Prints / [ed] R.W. Grubbström; H.H: Hinterhuber, 2008, Vol. 2, 511-520 p.Conference paper, Published paper (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

In autumn 2007 a new production facility were inaugurated in the north of Norway. To protect business confidentiality we will refer to the company as The Company and the product as the product. This work is based on pre study of the facility. The product is mass-produced in a highly automated production system consisting of series of chemical and mechanical processes. We investigate how variation in machine down time and different sizes of intermediate buffers affects total system performance. The investigation was done using a sensitivity analysis performed in a simulation environment for discrete event systems called AutoMod. Simulation was chosen instead of an analytical analysis because of two reasons: firstly, the production system consists of series of processes that influence each other, and secondly, we want to see the effect on both long term average values and short term variation. To analyze and compare two or more system configurations, system performance metrics are needed. In cooperation with the Company, the average and the variance of input rate (parts into the system per hour), output rate (parts out of the system per hour), WIP (parts in the system) and lead time (time in minutes each part is in the system) was chosen as performance metrics. This work shows that system configurations and system decisions should be compared not only with average metrics but also by some variation metrics. Another discovery is, when analysing throughput variation in a system, input – and output rate variation is not the same.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2008. Vol. 2, 511-520 p.
National Category
Production Engineering, Human Work Science and Ergonomics
Research subject
Industrial Logistics
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:ltu:diva-30920Local ID: 4edf76d0-65a8-4c7c-9d9a-95b9de898a73OAI: oai:DiVA.org:ltu-30920DiVA: diva2:1004149
Conference
International Working Seminar on Production Economics : 03/03/2008 - 07/03/2008
Note
Godkänd; 2008; 20140206 (ysko)Available from: 2016-09-30 Created: 2016-09-30 Last updated: 2017-10-20Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(107 kB)22 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 107 kBChecksum SHA-512
c3388d078ed2d420c0b99d39ed746a598ddb01394eea163bc367de27347c36f41e61164c4dfdc18cac4e4cbd0dc01e96802a8bdffd47f42a7bf43d7b266d81f1
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Segerstedt, Anders
By organisation
Business Administration and Industrial Engineering
Production Engineering, Human Work Science and Ergonomics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 22 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Total: 19 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf