Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Is video feedback in higher education worth a byte?
Luleå University of Technology, Department of Business Administration, Technology and Social Sciences, Innovation and Design.
Luleå University of Technology, Department of Civil, Environmental and Natural Resources Engineering, Operation, Maintenance and Acoustics.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3827-0295
Luleå University of Technology, Department of Arts, Communication and Education, Education, Language, and Teaching.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2407-9433
2015 (English)In: Great Expectations: Design Teaching, Research & Enterprise: Design Teaching, Research & Enterprise - Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Engineering and Product Design Education (E&PDE15) / [ed] Ahmed Kovacevic ; Guy Bingham; Brian Parkinsson, Glasgow: The Design Society Institution of Engineering Designers , 2015, p. 258-263Conference paper, Published paper (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

Feedback can be given in various situations, like after examinations, project work, and course completion. It is widely accepted that feedback is important for students’ learning, and it can be used in various ways, such as, written, face-to-face, and with the assistance of video recordings. This study focuses on the use of video recorded feedback to gather knowledge on how video recorded feedback can enhance the students learning. Since feedback in the study was given in video recordings, an alternate way was introduced, which add further insights for teaching and learning at university levels. The results showed that 94% preferred video recorded feedback over written feedback and they, in general, preferred face to face feedback (59%). Although, follow-up questions showed that the students found the recorded option beneficial since they could review the video several times in order to see and hear exactly what was stated and what part of their work it related to. In conclusion, video feedback of student work was perceived to be beneficial and the students and the teacher positively accepted it.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Glasgow: The Design Society Institution of Engineering Designers , 2015. p. 258-263
National Category
Other Engineering and Technologies not elsewhere specified Other Civil Engineering Pedagogy
Research subject
Industrial Design; Operation and Maintenance; Education
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:ltu:diva-33028Local ID: 7c1dff6c-6965-4eff-abe2-0ff4fe4242c7ISBN: 9781904670629 (print)OAI: oai:DiVA.org:ltu-33028DiVA, id: diva2:1006263
Conference
International Conference on Engineering and Product Design Education : 03/09/2015 - 04/09/2015
Note
Godkänd; 2015; 20150906 (anbe)Available from: 2016-09-30 Created: 2016-09-30 Last updated: 2018-01-24Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Berglund, AndersTretten, PhillipHögström, Per
By organisation
Innovation and DesignOperation, Maintenance and AcousticsEducation, Language, and Teaching
Other Engineering and Technologies not elsewhere specifiedOther Civil EngineeringPedagogy

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

isbn
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

isbn
urn-nbn
Total: 303 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf