Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
The effects of procurement procedures on joint risk management
Luleå University of Technology, Department of Civil, Environmental and Natural Resources Engineering, Structural and Construction Engineering.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8607-1464
Luleå University of Technology, Department of Business Administration, Technology and Social Sciences, Innovation and Design.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1746-2637
2009 (English)In: Twenty-Fifth Annual Conference, 2009, September 7-9, Albert Hall, Nottingham / [ed] Andrew Dainty, Reading: Association of Researchers in Construction Management , 2009, 1305-1314 p.Conference paper, Published paper (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

Over the last decade, researchers and practitioners have recognised that the relationships between the client and the contractor play a significant role for successful project implementation. The interest in joint risk management (JRM) has increased as it strengthens collaboration between project actors and contributes to a more effective risk management process.  The lack of an iterative and cooperative approach to risk management is a weakness in current procurement practice; although several empirical studies show that the project actors are positive about implementation of JRM. The purpose of this research is to investigate how common the use of JRM is in Sweden and if the occurrence is affected by the chosen procurement procedures. Empirical data was collected through a questionnaire survey of 106 members of the Swedish Construction Clients Forum. The results show limited use of JRM in construction projects. Clients that work on a national/international level use JRM to a greater extent than those on the local/regional market. The analysis also indicates that the use of JRM is positively affected by cooperative procurement procedures. In particular, the most significant relationship is found between collaborative tools and JRM - the higher the use of collaborative tools, the higher the use of JRM.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Reading: Association of Researchers in Construction Management , 2009. 1305-1314 p.
National Category
Construction Management Other Engineering and Technologies not elsewhere specified
Research subject
Construction Engineering and Management; Entrepreneurship and Innovation
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:ltu:diva-37065Local ID: af1676c0-a690-11de-8293-000ea68e967bISBN: 978-0-9552390-2-1 (print)ISBN: 0-9552390-1-X (electronic)ISBN: 978-0-9552390-1-4 (electronic)OAI: oai:DiVA.org:ltu-37065DiVA: diva2:1010563
Conference
Annual ARCOM Conference : 07/09/2009 - 09/09/2009
Projects
Systematisk gemensam riskhantering i byggprojekt
Note
Godkänd; 2009; 20090921 (ekaosi)Available from: 2016-10-03 Created: 2016-10-03 Last updated: 2017-10-19Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(138 kB)42 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 138 kBChecksum SHA-512
3f26931f08b59c5317864fb3812669c8bf251b55bdf7fedd511d35c98ebedf6b8117a3cb39631105db428a25dfc8d095f93ae810437865a72990ca7622cfb64f
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Osipova, EkaterinaEriksson, Per-Erik
By organisation
Structural and Construction EngineeringInnovation and Design
Construction ManagementOther Engineering and Technologies not elsewhere specified

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 42 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Total: 47 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf