Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
An analysis of evaluation practices for DTN routing protocols
Luleå University of Technology, Department of Business Administration, Technology and Social Sciences, Human Work Science.
2012 (English)In: CHANTS '12: Proceedings of the seventh ACM international workshop on Challenged network, New York: Association for Computing Machinery (ACM), 2012, 57-65 p.Conference paper, Published paper (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

Over the past decade, a lot of research has been done to develop efficient routing protocols for Delay- and Disruption Tolerant Networks (DTNs). In the course of this work, many comparative evaluation studies have been done to determine which of two proposed protocols is the better one (for a given situation). The majority of these evaluations are based on results gained from simulated network environments. In order to conduct a relevant evaluation of routing schemes, numerous conditions, policies and data need to be specified and fed into the simulation environment. The aim of our work in this paper is to discuss current DTN evaluation practices through a thorough and critical literature study. Based on the surveyed material, we show some weaknesses and lack of argumentation used in the evaluations. Through this, we hope to aid in bridging the gap between simulated and real-world DTN environments. In addition, and as a call for further research, we propose a model for evaluation of DTN routing schemes that outlines the most crucial inputs that needs to be considered in the evaluation process. This model is then projected onto evaluation practices used for evaluations of DTN routing protocols in a set of sixteen papers roughly covering a decade of DTN research.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
New York: Association for Computing Machinery (ACM), 2012. 57-65 p.
National Category
Production Engineering, Human Work Science and Ergonomics
Research subject
Gender and Technology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:ltu:diva-39412DOI: 10.1145/2348616.2348629Local ID: e2ade4fa-de61-4b99-84cf-d0b946e988c1ISBN: 978-1-4503-1284-4 (electronic)OAI: oai:DiVA.org:ltu-39412DiVA: diva2:1012923
Conference
ACM Workshop on Challenged Networks : 22/08/2012 - 22/08/2012
Note
Godkänd; 2012; 20120923 (samo)Available from: 2016-10-03 Created: 2016-10-03 Last updated: 2017-10-19Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(217 kB)66 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 217 kBChecksum SHA-512
2a8ffab54c21494e8d39ef4ddfa7fe9d74c38fe8b536896576971b0d2a91d13aa9405b48830468789dedd155e088a9f844fe9abebae15dbf8e68289b3b60c404
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Grasic, SamoLindgren, Anders
By organisation
Human Work Science
Production Engineering, Human Work Science and Ergonomics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 66 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 146 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf