Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Structural health monitoring of the Gröndals bridge in Sweden: the behaviour of CFRP strengthening in cold temperature
Luleå University of Technology, Department of Civil, Environmental and Natural Resources Engineering, Structural and Construction Engineering.
2006 (English)In: Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering, ISSN 0277-786X, E-ISSN 1996-756X, Vol. 6176, no 17Article in journal (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

To obtain a better knowledge of existing structures behaviour monitoring can be used. The use of monitoring in bridge structures by the use of instruments to assess the integrity of structures is not new and there are reports from structures tested as early as in the 19th century according to ISIS Canada1 However, the term SHM (Structural Health Monitoring) is relatively new to civil engineering and the driving force to implement SHM comes from recognising the limitations of conventional visual inspections and evaluations using conservative codes of practice. The possibilities to monitor existing structures with help of the rapidly evolving Information Technology are to day carried out. The objective of SHM is to monitor the in-situ behaviour of a structure accurately and efficiently, to assess its performance under various service conditions, to detect damage or deterioration, and to determine the health or condition of the structure1. In Sweden strengthening and periodic monitoring of a large freivorbau bridge (pre-stresed concrete box girder bridge) has been carried out, the Gröndals Bridge. The bridge is located in Stockholm and is approximately 400 m in length with a free span of 120 m. It was opened to tram traffic in year 2000. Just after opening cracks were noticed in the webs, these cracks have then increased, the size of the largest cracks exceeded 0.5 mm, and at the end of year 2001 the bridge was temporarily strengthened. This was carried out with externally placed prestressed steel stays. The reason for cracking is quite clear but the responsibility is still debated. Nevertheless, it was evidently that the bridge needed to be strengthened. The strengthening methods used were CFRP plates in the Service Limit State (SLS) and prestressed dywidag stays in the Ultimate Limit State (ULS). The strengthening was carried out during year 2002. At the same time monitoring of the bridge commenced, using LVDT crack gauges as well as optical fibre sensors. This monitoring was carried out during the summer period. In addition to this a winter monitoring was carried out in the beginning of 2005. This paper presents the background to strengthening and a comparison between summer and winter monitoring where the strengthening behaviour between the two seasons is enlightened. The result from the monitoring is very interesting; it would have been preferable to strengthen the bridge during the winter.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2006. Vol. 6176, no 17
Research subject
Structural Engineering
URN: urn:nbn:se:ltu:diva-39760DOI: 10.1117/12.663987Local ID: e9f07bb0-7027-11dd-8151-000ea68e967bOAI: diva2:1013278
Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring of Aerospace Materials, Composites, and Civil Infrastructure : 26/02/2006
Godkänd; 2006; Bibliografisk uppgift: Volumne: 6176; 20080822 (ysko); Konferensartikel i tidskriftAvailable from: 2016-10-03 Created: 2016-10-03Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Hejll, ArvidTäljsten, BjörnCarolin, Anders
By organisation
Structural and Construction Engineering
In the same journal
Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

Altmetric score

Total: 14 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link