Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
‘Treating networks seriously’ in conservation management: How a network approach can enhance our understanding of collective action, legitimacy, and adaptive capacity
Luleå University of Technology, Department of Business Administration, Technology and Social Sciences, Social Sciences.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1685-5527
2013 (English)Conference paper, Oral presentation only (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

The challenges of conservation management originate in ecological as well as social complexities. Social factors like institutional uncertainties, multi-actor settings, competing goals, and conflicts of interest often impede the evolution of legitimate and adaptive management systems. The argument proposed here is that these challenges should be approached through social networks. Based on social science theories and by means of empirical illustrations from fishery and carnivore management, three arguments for a social network approach are suggested. The first emphasizes the descriptive value of a network perspective; it contributes greatly to the process of defining the boundaries of the social system and to the generation of important information regarding the actors and their interactions. The second argument stresses the theoretical contribution of a network approach and rests on findings from previous research on the interplay between different network characteristics and management outcome. The main message is that the structure of a network affects the way it functions. The third argument is based on a managerial perspective and discusses implications for institutional design. The issue of how to design new, or influence existing, management systems to improve their capacity to deal with social challenges is elaborated. To conclude, research on conservation management has much to gain by ‘treating networks seriously.’

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2013.
National Category
Political Science (excluding Public Administration Studies and Globalization Studies)
Research subject
Political Science
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:ltu:diva-40123Local ID: f1dd5a98-251d-4e47-9d49-0441dbabeefeOAI: oai:DiVA.org:ltu-40123DiVA: diva2:1013646
Conference
International Congress for Conservation Biology : 21/07/2013 - 25/07/2013
Note
Godkänd; 2013; 20131210 (annicas)Available from: 2016-10-03 Created: 2016-10-03 Last updated: 2017-12-01Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Authority records BETA

Sandström, Annica

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Sandström, Annica
By organisation
Social Sciences
Political Science (excluding Public Administration Studies and Globalization Studies)

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 45 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf