Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Key Characteristics as a Practice toAchieve Robust Design: A case study in the aerospace industry
2014 (English)Independent thesis Advanced level (professional degree), 20 credits / 30 HE creditsStudent thesisAlternative title
Användande av nyckelegenskaper för att uppnå robust konstruktion : En fallstudie inom flygindustrin (Swedish)
Abstract [en]

Continuous technological development and increasing efficiency demands are driving products toward becoming more and more complex. For the aerospace industry - where the requirements for performance, safety and low environmental impact already are substantial - this means that more extensive quality assurance measures must be taken to ensure the fulfillment of the requirements of each individual component.However, to avoid that the work with quality improvement become too extensive and increase the product cost to unbearable levels it is necessary to have methods to prioritize and focus improvement efforts on the product features that matters most for fulfilling customer requirements. Therefore, the concept of Key Characteristics is used today, both in the aerospace and other industries; a term for those characteristics that have a significant impact on requirement compliance and whose outcomes at the same time are expected to vary considerably in manufacturing.The concept itself is similar among those who use it but the purpose of and methodology for identifying and managing Key Characteristics vary, even within the same industry. This thesis is therefore aimed to create a view of which factors that characterize an effective and efficient way for companies in the aerospace industry to work with Key Characteristics. The thesis involves a case study to create a framework for how companies within this industry work with Key Characteristics, a literature review to see which approaches are advocated by previous research and two benchmark studies to see examples of how Key Characteristics are used and handled in practice in industry.The results show that the work of Key Characteristics should meet three main criteria in order to be effective and efficient: • it must be clearly focused on the characteristics that have critical impact on customer requirements and at the same time considerable variation in production, • it should be initiated early in the product development process and then performed iteratively during the process of continuously reducing variation problems in manufacturing, and • it should identify Key Characteristics using both qualitative and quantitative tools to best capture all different kinds of requirements on the product.Finally a practical example is given of how the work with Key Characteristics should look like at GKN Sweden AB, the case study company in the aerospace industry, to effectively minimize the costs associated with production variation, and yet satisfy all customer requirements.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2014. , p. 91
Keywords [en]
Technology
Keywords [sv]
Teknik, Robust, Design, Design for robustness, Key characteristics, Key, Characteristic, Aerospace, GKN, Aircraft, Variation, AS9103, Variation management, Risk, Volvo, Saab, Variation risk management, Flight safety, Safety, Flow-down, Thornton, Critical item, Critical, Item, Characteristics, Proactive, VRM, CI, KC, Risk mitigation, Flowdown, Product development, Development, Product characteristics, Product defects, Defect, Deviation, Variation cost, Quality, Critical effect, PDP
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:ltu:diva-49690Local ID: 70199034-e987-4536-a2e9-395cb89304c6OAI: oai:DiVA.org:ltu-49690DiVA, id: diva2:1023037
External cooperation
Subject / course
Student thesis, at least 30 credits
Educational program
Industrial and Management Engineering, master's level
Supervisors
Examiners
Note

Validerat; 20140811 (global_studentproject_submitter)

Available from: 2016-10-04 Created: 2016-10-04 Last updated: 2018-04-25Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(1849 kB)699 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT02.pdfFile size 1849 kBChecksum SHA-512
4125048257f68de8f202165cf576d9b82c00312e04f08d4e3f724ece1c6044573c5b6a27e5e243a4d45cb5f229c39c724ceb2c297afb2ef427495b6031985388
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Berglund, JacobEricsson, Martin

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 700 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 525 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf