Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Open guilt and secret shame: the difference between guilt and shame as depicted in The Scarlet Letter
2004 (English)Independent thesis Advanced level (degree of Master (One Year)), 10 credits / 15 HE creditsStudent thesis
Abstract [en]

This essay attempts to analyse and discuss the difference between guilt and shame as depicted in The Scarlet Letter. Since the surrounding norms and conventions affect people’s actions, thoughts and feelings, it is necessary to take a closer look at the specific society depicted in the novel, which is that of Puritan New England. The first chapter, therefore, presents a description of the Puritan society. The Puritans lived by strict codes which encouraged the confession of sin and public repentance. The philosophical overview which forms the basis of the theme of guilt and shame to the novel under discussion is focused on the questions: what is guilt? what is shame? What are the differences between guilt and shame? Where do guilt and shame come from? Through the theories of different philosophers and psychologists it is argued that guilt arises from a negative evaluation of a specific behaviour, somewhat apart from the self. Shame is more about the quality of our person or self, which is found to be undesirable. In other words shame is about the self and guilt is about actions and laws. After having established a working understanding of some important aspects of what the conditions known as guilt and shame appear to be, the second part examines the nature and effect of these two terms, and the difference between the concepts through a detailed character analysis of Hester Prynne and Arthur Dimmesdale. These two characters experience guilt and shame, and the effects of the public’s opinion on their own personal sins.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2004.
Keywords [en]
Humanities Theology, The Scarlet Letter, Nathaniel Hawthorne, Guilt, Shame
Keywords [sv]
Humaniora, Teologi
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:ltu:diva-50362ISRN: LTU-DUPP--04/11--SELocal ID: 7a2b2850-3ab1-427b-b74e-4484e8a57295OAI: oai:DiVA.org:ltu-50362DiVA, id: diva2:1023721
Subject / course
Student thesis, at least 15 credits
Educational program
English, master's level
Examiners
Note
Validerat; 20101217 (root)Available from: 2016-10-04 Created: 2016-10-04Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(223 kB)17556 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 223 kBChecksum SHA-512
eac7b91b25abf67a8705ab079ef36e6b29222fec72c43286727a7588a58f503c3ca572d224888aee83365f2553c35338334026d185ca62983b36545f274146a5
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 17558 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 3354 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf