Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
A framework for evaluating the effectiveness of Flood Emergency Management Systems in Europe
Utrecht Centre for Water, Oceans and Sustainability Law, Utrecht University.
Flood Hazard Research Centre, Middlesex University.
Institute for Agricultural and Forest Environment, Polish Academy of Sciences, Poland.
Luleå University of Technology, Department of Business Administration, Technology and Social Sciences, Social Sciences.ORCID iD: 2-s2.0-85008156069
Show others and affiliations
Number of Authors: 5
2016 (English)In: Ecology & society, ISSN 1708-3087, E-ISSN 1708-3087, Vol. 21, no 4, 27Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Society is faced with a range of contemporary threats to everyday life, from natural and technological hazards to accidents and terrorism. These are embodied within integrated emergency management arrangements that are designed to enhance preparedness and response to such incidents, and in turn facilitate a prompt recovery. Such arrangements must be inherently dynamic and evolve as new threats emerge or as existing threats change. An example of the latter is the changing nature of flooding, which is projected to increase in both frequency and severity with climate change. Recognizing this evolving threat, we focus on the evaluation of the effectiveness of domestic Flood Emergency Management Systems (FEMS) as components of integrated emergency management arrangements. Despite the extensive body of literature that documents success conditions of so-called effective emergency management more broadly, there have been only a few attempts to construct a comprehensive evaluation framework to support objective assessment and cross-country comparison. Addressing this gap, we formulate an evaluation framework specifically tailored to the study of FEMS in Europe, which is then provisionally applied to the study of FEMS in England (UK), France, the Netherlands, Poland, and Sweden. Important differences are observed in how FEMS have evolved in relation to differing contextual backgrounds (political, cultural, administrative, and socio-economic) and exposures to flood hazard. From this provisional assessment, a number of opportunities for, and constraints to, enhancing the effectiveness of FEMS in Europe are discerned. The evaluation framework thus serves as an important stepping stone for further indepth inquiry, and as a valuable tool for future comparative study.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2016. Vol. 21, no 4, 27
Keyword [en]
effectiveness; emergency management; England; evaluation framework; flood; France; Netherlands; Poland; Sweden
National Category
Law (excluding Law and Society)
Research subject
URN: urn:nbn:se:ltu:diva-60415DOI: 10.5751/ES-08723-210427ISI: 000391199400014ScopusID: 2-s2.0-85008156069OAI: diva2:1046719
EU, FP7, Seventh Framework Programme

Validerad; 2016; Nivå 2; 2016-11-16 (andbra)

Available from: 2016-11-15 Created: 2016-11-15 Last updated: 2017-02-10Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Pettersson, Maria
By organisation
Social Sciences
In the same journal
Ecology & society
Law (excluding Law and Society)

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

Altmetric score

Total: 27 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link