Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Effects of low-load motor control exercises and a high-load lifting exercise on lumbar multifidus thickness: a randomized controlled trial
Department of Community Medicine and Rehabilitation, Physiotherapy, Umeå University.
Norrlandsklinikens hälsocentral, Umeå.
Luleå University of Technology, Department of Health Sciences, Health and Rehab.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0112-4657
Department of Community Medicine and Rehabilitation, Umeå University.
2017 (English)In: Spine, ISSN 0362-2436, E-ISSN 1528-1159, Vol. 42, no 15, E876-E882 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

STUDY DESIGN:Randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE:

The aim of this study was to compare the effects of low-load motor control (LMC) exercises and a high-load lifting (HLL) exercise, on lumbar multifidus (LM) thickness on either side of the spine and whether the effects were affected by pain intensity or change in pain intensity.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA:

There is evidence that patients with low back pain (LBP) may have a decreased size of the LM muscles with an asymmetry between sides in the lower back. It has also been shown that LMC training can affect this asymmetry. It is, however, not known whether a high-load exercise has the same effect.

METHODS:

Sixty-five participants diagnosed with nociceptive mechanical LBP were included and randomized into LMC exercises or a HLL exercise, the deadlift. The LM thickness was measured using rehabilitative ultrasound imaging (RUSI), at baseline and after a 2-month training period.

RESULTS:

There were no differences between interventions regarding effect on LM muscle thickness. However, the analysis showed a significant effect for asymmetry. The thickness of the LM muscle on the small side increased significantly compared with the large side in both intervention groups, without influence of pain at baseline, or change in pain intensity.

CONCLUSION:

At baseline, there was a difference in thickness of the LM muscles between sides. It seems that exercises focusing on spinal alignment may increase the thickness of the LM muscles on the small side, irrespective of exercise load. The increase in LM thickness does not appear to be mediated by either current pain intensity or the magnitude of change in pain intensity.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Wolters Kluwer, 2017. Vol. 42, no 15, E876-E882 p.
National Category
Physiotherapy
Research subject
Physiotherapy
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:ltu:diva-60433DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001989PubMedID: 27870804Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-84996721427OAI: oai:DiVA.org:ltu-60433DiVA: diva2:1046845
Note

Validerad;2017;Nivå 2;2017-08-10 (rokbeg)

Available from: 2016-11-15 Created: 2016-11-15 Last updated: 2017-08-10Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Michaelson, Peter
By organisation
Health and Rehab
In the same journal
Spine
Physiotherapy

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

Altmetric score

Total: 92 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf