Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Social impacts of the “glocal” mining business: case studies from Northern Europe
Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Lapland, Rovaniemi.
Luleå University of Technology, Department of Business Administration, Technology and Social Sciences, Social Sciences.
Institute of the Industrial Ecology Problems of the North, Kola Science Center, Russian Academy of Sciences, Murmansk region.
Luzin Institute of Economic Problems, Kola Science Center, Russian Academy of Sciences, Murmansk region.
Show others and affiliations
Number of Authors: 6
2017 (English)In: Mineral Economics, ISSN 2191-2203, E-ISSN 2191-2211, Vol. 30, no 1, 31-39 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Mining is a global business with international networks of production and consumption, but mineral deposits are place specific and the impacts of mining projects are mostly experienced locally. Hence, mining is an example of a glocal phenomenon par excellence: global processes are realized in local communities and environments. This paper discusses the social impacts of mining in eight communities situated in Northern Europe. The data consist of 85 semi-structured interviews conducted in 2013 and 2014. Using a qualitative approach and starting from the bottom-up, the analyses identified three impact frames that combined individual experiences and meanings expressed in the interviews. The first impact frame focuses on environmental justice. Environmental impacts are corporeal, cognitive, and emotional, as they affect the real life of people living in the vicinity of the mine. The main finding is that environmental “bads” are experienced locally in the North, whereas the economic “goods” go to mining companies and consumers in the “South.” The second impact frame looks at the loss of livelihoods and the cultural way of life. Mining is seen as a threat, especially to reindeer herding and nature-based practices. In the areas where mining is a new industry, the activity is seen as antithetical to those small-scale activities of a local economy. The third impact frame centers on experiences and concerns about the dependency of a community on a single industry. When the fortunes of local communities are dependent on international business and the fluctuations of global markets, the residents feel that they have no power to influence the developments and can thus only adapt.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2017. Vol. 30, no 1, 31-39 p.
National Category
Political Science (excluding Public Administration Studies and Globalization Studies) Economics
Research subject
Economics; Political Science
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:ltu:diva-60758DOI: 10.1007/s13563-016-0092-5Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85015943480OAI: oai:DiVA.org:ltu-60758DiVA: diva2:1050406
Note

Validerad; 2017; Nivå 1; 2017-03-23 (rokbeg)

Available from: 2016-11-29 Created: 2016-11-29 Last updated: 2017-04-06Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Ejdemo, ThomasPoelzer, Gregory A.
By organisation
Social Sciences
In the same journal
Mineral Economics
Political Science (excluding Public Administration Studies and Globalization Studies)Economics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

Altmetric score

Total: 288 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf