Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Rationales for technology-specific RES support and their relevance for German policy
Helmholtz-Centre for Environmental Research – UFZ, Leipzig.
Helmholtz-Centre for Environmental Research – UFZ, Leipzig.
Helmholtz-Centre for Environmental Research – UFZ, Leipzig.
Luleå University of Technology, Department of Business Administration, Technology and Social Sciences, Social Sciences.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2264-7043
Show others and affiliations
Number of Authors: 5
2017 (English)In: Energy Policy, ISSN 0301-4215, E-ISSN 1873-6777, Vol. 102, 22 p.16-26 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

In order to achieve cost-effective RES-E deployment it is often argued that technology-neutral support schemes for renewables are indispensable. Against this background, RES-E support policies making widely use of technology differentiation in remuneration settings, e.g. across the EU, are frequently criticized from a theoretical point of view. However, in this paper we provide a systematic critique of the technology neutrality concept as a foundation for designing policy support schemes in the RES-E technology field. Specifically, the main objective of the paper is to scrutinize the arguments for technology-neutrality, and discuss three conceptual arguments for why technology-specific support schemes could in fact help minimize the societal costs of reaching future RES-E targets. We also briefly address different political economy concerns, which could constrain the choice of cost-effective policy support schemes, and that have to be taken into account for economic policy advice. For empirical illustration of the key arguments we refer to the case of German RES-E policy-making. The central conclusion from this paper is that technology-specific RES-E support schemes may generate significant economic benefits, particularly if technology markets work imperfectly and in second-best policy settings with additional non-internalized market failures.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2017. Vol. 102, 22 p.16-26 p.
National Category
Economics
Research subject
Economics; Renewable energy (AERI)
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:ltu:diva-61138DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2016.12.007ISI: 000397357200003ScopusID: 2-s2.0-85002802039OAI: oai:DiVA.org:ltu-61138DiVA: diva2:1057628
Note

Validerad; 2017; Nivå 2; 2016-12-19 (andbra)

Available from: 2016-12-19 Created: 2016-12-19 Last updated: 2017-04-18Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Söderholm, Patrik
By organisation
Social Sciences
In the same journal
Energy Policy
Economics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

Altmetric score

Total: 154 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf