Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Flood risk mitigation in Europe: how far away are we from the aspired forms of adaptive governance?
Laboratoire Géomatique et Foncier, Conservatoire National des Arts et Métiers, Ecole Supérieure des Géomètres et Topographes.
Paris School of Planning, Lab'Urba, Paris Est University.
Sustainability Research Institute, School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds.
Environmental Governance, Copernicus Institute of Sustainable Development, Utrecht University.
Show others and affiliations
Number of Authors: 9
2016 (English)In: Ecology & society, ISSN 1708-3087, E-ISSN 1708-3087, Vol. 21, no 4, 49Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Flood mitigation is a strategy that is growing in importance across Europe. This growth corresponds with an increasing emphasis on the need to learn to live with floods and make space for water. Flood mitigation measures aim at reducing the likelihood and magnitude of flooding and complement flood defenses. They are being put in place through the implementation of actions that accommodate (rather than resist) water, such as natural flood management or adapted housing. The strategy has gained momentum over the past 20. years in an effort to improve the sustainability of flood risk management (FRM) and facilitate the diversification of FRM in the pursuit of societal resilience to flooding. Simultaneously, it is increasingly argued that adaptive forms of governance are best placed to address the uncertainty and complexity associated with social-ecological systems responding to environmental challenges, such as flooding. However, there have been few attempts to examine the extent to which current flood risk governance, and flood mitigation specifically, reflect these aspired forms of adaptive governance. Drawing from EU research into flood risk governance, conducted within the STAR-FLOOD project, we examine the governance of flood mitigation in six European countries: Belgium, England, France, the Netherlands, Poland, and Sweden. Using in-depth policy and legal analysis, as well as interviews with key actors, the governance and implementation of flood mitigation in these countries is evaluated from the normative viewpoint of whether, and to what extent, it can be characterized as adaptive governance. We identify five criteria of adaptive governance based on a comprehensive literature review and apply these to each country to determine the “distance” between current governance arrangements and adaptive governance. In conclusion, the flood mitigation strategy provides various opportunities for actors to further pursue forms of adaptive governance. The extent to which the mitigation strategy is capable of doing so varies across countries, however, and its role in stimulating adaptive governance was found to be strongest in Belgium and

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2016. Vol. 21, no 4, 49
Keyword [en]
adaptive governance; climate change; country comparison; European Union; flood; mitigation; risk
National Category
Law (excluding Law and Society)
Research subject
URN: urn:nbn:se:ltu:diva-61159DOI: 10.5751/ES-08991-210449ScopusID: 2-s2.0-85008172789OAI: diva2:1058004
EU, FP7, Seventh Framework Programme, 308364

Validerad; 2017; Nivå 2; 2017-01-13 (andbra)

Available from: 2016-12-20 Created: 2016-12-20 Last updated: 2017-01-13Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Pettersson, Maria
By organisation
Social Sciences
In the same journal
Ecology & society
Law (excluding Law and Society)

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

Altmetric score

Total: 2 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link