Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Can pelvic floor muscle training improve qualityof life in men with mild to moderate post-strokeand lower urinary tract symptoms?
Department of Occupational Therapy and Physiotherapy, Rigshospitale, Glostrup.
Division of Physiotherapy, Department of Health Sciences, Lund University.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6975-8344
Danish Cancer Society Research Center.
Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet.
Show others and affiliations
2017 (English)In: European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, ISSN 1973-9087, E-ISSN 1973-9095, Vol. 53, no 3, 416-425 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

BACKGROUND: Lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) have a significant impact on quality of life (QoL) in post‑stroke patients.AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) on QoL parameters in men with post‑stroke LUTS.DESIGN: Randomized, controlled and single‑blinded trial.SETTING: Outpatients, University Hospital.POPULATION: Thirty‑one men, median age 68 (interquartile range 60-74) years, with post‑stroke LUTS were included. Thirty participants completed the study.METHODS: The participants randomized to the treatment group were treated in a systematic, controlled and intensive PFMT program over 3 months (12 weekly sessions). The participants randomized to the control group did not receive specific LUTS treatment. The effect was measured on the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) and the Nocturia Quality‑of‑Life (N‑QoL) Questionnaire.RESULTS: The results on SF-36 indicated significant improvement within pre- and post‑test in the domains emotional role (median 77 to 100, P=0.03) and vitality (median 65 to 70, P=0.03) in the treatment group, but not the control group. There were no statistically significant differences between groups at pre‑test, post‑test or 6-month follow‑up. The results on N‑QoL indicated statistically significant differences between pre- and post‑test in the bother/concern domain in both groups and in sleep/energy for the control group, but not the treatment group. There were no statistically significant differences between groups.CONCLUSIONS: PFMT may improve the emotional health and vitality domains of QoL in men with mild to moderate post‑stroke and LUTS; however the improvements in the treatment group were not significantly better than for the control group. PFMT did not improve nocturia‑related QoL.CLINICAL REHABILITATION IMPACT: This study is the first to evaluate the effect of PFMT on QoL parameters in men with mild to moderate post‑stroke and LUTS. The results indicate some short‑term effect on SF-36 but none on N‑QoL. However, further studies with larger sample sizes and with less restrictive inclusion and exclusion criteria are requested.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Edizioni Minerva Medica , 2017. Vol. 53, no 3, 416-425 p.
National Category
Physiotherapy
Research subject
Physiotherapy
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:ltu:diva-61207DOI: 10.23736/S1973-9087.16.04119-8PubMedID: 27003595OAI: oai:DiVA.org:ltu-61207DiVA: diva2:1058809
Available from: 2016-12-21 Created: 2016-12-21 Last updated: 2017-07-03Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedhttp://www.minervamedica.it/en/journals/europa-medicophysica/article.php?cod=R33Y9999N00A16032201

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Gard, Gunvor
In the same journal
European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine
Physiotherapy

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

Altmetric score

Total: 85 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf