System disruptions
We are currently experiencing disruptions on the search portals due to high traffic. We are working to resolve the issue, you may temporarily encounter an error message.
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Flow and resource efficiency measurement method in off-site production
Luleå University of Technology, Department of Civil, Environmental and Natural Resources Engineering, Industrilized and sustainable construction.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0305-623X
Luleå University of Technology, Department of Civil, Environmental and Natural Resources Engineering, Industrilized and sustainable construction.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5907-7788
Luleå University of Technology, Department of Civil, Environmental and Natural Resources Engineering, Industrilized and sustainable construction.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3067-9451
2017 (English)In: IGLC 2017: Proceedings of the 25th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction 2017 / [ed] Brilakis I.,Walsh K.,Sacks R., The International Group for Lean Construction , 2017, p. 861-868Conference paper, Published paper (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

Although the focus remains primarily on high resource efficiency, the significance of flow efficiency in construction is continuously increasing. Flow and resource efficiency describe two competing target viewpoints, which focus on reducing non-value adding activities and maximizing resource utilization, respectively. Recent research has shown that balancing both perspectives provides a viable solution. However, the exact measurement of flow and resource efficiency in construction remains unclear. Therefore, the aim of this work is to evaluate a possible flow and resource efficiency measurement method in the off-site production context of volumetric element construction, and assess the industrial relevance thereof. Work sampling has been used to collect data from a building project flowing through the off-site production system. The validity of the method has been checked statistically, through a focus-group workshop and with calculation figures from the case company. Work sampling allows flow and resource efficiency measurements in an off-site production system. The method delivers current status figures of companies, yielding a balance between flow and resource efficiency.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
The International Group for Lean Construction , 2017. p. 861-868
National Category
Building Technologies
Research subject
Timber Structures
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:ltu:diva-65882DOI: 10.24928/2017/0094Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85029593743OAI: oai:DiVA.org:ltu-65882DiVA, id: diva2:1145736
Conference
25th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction, IGLC 2017, Hersonissos, Crete, Greece, 9-12 July 2017
Available from: 2017-09-29 Created: 2017-09-29 Last updated: 2023-09-05Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. Diversity of Flow in Production Improvements in House Building
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Diversity of Flow in Production Improvements in House Building
2020 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Alternative title[sv]
Flow, flyt eller flöde och dess mångfald i produktionsförbättringar inom husbyggande
Abstract [en]

Flow is a complex construct and has developed differently in different research fields. Some of the interpretations are included within this thesis and  categorized  in  two  main  perspectives:  (1)  the  individual  flow  perspective as defined in positive psychology and (2) the system flow perspective  based  on  notations  from  supply  chain  management,  lean  production,  construction  management,  and  operations  management. Both flow perspectives have at least one commonality which bases this thesis: to improve something towards a desirable condition. In positive psychology,  that  something  is  human  well‐being  and  the  system  perspective  focuses  on  entities  that  need  to  be  combined  to  facilitate production. Both flow perspectives have been developed independently without  clear  consideration  of  each  other,  even  though  several  theoretical sources indicate relevant relations between them. This thesis addresses that theoretical gap and aims to describe how system flows and  individuals’  flow  are  related  in  initiatives  intended  to  improve  production in house building.

The thesis is operationalized by a flow framework based on system flows and  individuals’  flow.  Within  three  different  cases  of  improvement  initiatives, qualitative data is analysed to exemplify how flow relations occur  in  the  researched  settings.  Findings  of  quantitative  patterns  of  traced  flow  relations  exemplify  flow  relations  and  can  inspire practitioners  in  assessing  how  the  different  flows  are  addressed  in  ongoing  improvement  initiatives  and  what  other  potential  flows  that could be addressed in future improvements. This thesis concludes that relations between flow on system level and flow on individual level can occur in improvement initiatives in house building production settings, thus  exemplifying  the  ‘Diversity  of  Flow  in  Production  Improvements  in  House  Building’.  Theoretically,  this  thesis  contributes  to  the understanding  of  the  flow  concept  in  construction  management, visualizes the diverse understanding of flow, and advocates that flow should not be treated as homogenous at any level.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Luleå: Luleå University of Technology, 2020
Series
Doctoral thesis / Luleå University of Technology 1 jan 1997 → …, ISSN 1402-1544
National Category
Construction Management
Research subject
Construction Management and Building Technology
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:ltu:diva-81180 (URN)978-91-7790-691-9 (ISBN)978-91-7790-692-6 (ISBN)
Public defence
2020-12-15, E632, LTU, Luleå, 13:00 (English)
Opponent
Supervisors
Available from: 2020-10-19 Created: 2020-10-19 Last updated: 2020-11-25Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Wernicke, BrianLidelöw, HelenaStehn, Lars

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Wernicke, BrianLidelöw, HelenaStehn, Lars
By organisation
Industrilized and sustainable construction
Building Technologies

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 660 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf