Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Experiences of educational reform: Implementation of cdio at industrial design engineering
Luleå University of Technology, Department of Business Administration, Technology and Social Sciences, Humans and technology.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8992-9470
Luleå University of Technology, Department of Business Administration, Technology and Social Sciences, Humans and technology.
Luleå University of Technology, Department of Business Administration, Technology and Social Sciences, Humans and technology.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7108-6356
Luleå University of Technology, Department of Business Administration, Technology and Social Sciences, Humans and technology.ORCID iD: 0009-0001-2620-2490
2017 (English)In: Proceedings of the 13th International CDIO Conference, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada, June 18-­22, 2017, University of Calgary Press, 2017, Calgary: University of Calgary Press, 2017Conference paper, Published paper (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

Luleå University of Technology (LTU) joined the CDIO initiative in 2015. The development of the MSc program Industrial Design Engineering (IDE) was one of LTU’s four test pilots of educational reform with support of the CDIO framework. The current educational reform comprises all CDIO standards, however some have been easier to implement than others. The results from the current CDIO-implementation are so far positive experiences from both faculty and students. While the program curriculum has been developed at a macro level, changes also impact the program objectives, teachers’ skills development, and students’ learning outcomes at a micro level where, for example, courses have been redesigned regarding teaching and learning activities, and assessments have been developed to include both formative and summative feedback to promote a deep learning approach. Great efforts have also been put into development of new learning environments, finalized in 2016. However, implementation of CDIO also deals with changing the educational culture, a work that takes more efforts and time than just one year. A success factor in the current implementation is the involvement of experienced CDIO-implementers that have inspired, motivated and coached the IDE faculty in re-designing the program. 

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Calgary: University of Calgary Press, 2017.
Keywords [en]
Educational reform, CDIO implementation, Active learning, Standards: 2-10
National Category
Design Didactics Other Engineering and Technologies Other Engineering and Technologies
Research subject
Industrial Design; Product Innovation
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:ltu:diva-67558OAI: oai:DiVA.org:ltu-67558DiVA, id: diva2:1181158
Conference
13th International CDIO Conference, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada, June 18-­22, 2017
Available from: 2018-02-07 Created: 2018-02-07 Last updated: 2025-02-25Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

DOI för värdpublikation

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Wikberg Nilsson, ÅsaNormark, JörgenTörlind, PeterÖhrling, Therese
By organisation
Humans and technology
DesignDidacticsOther Engineering and TechnologiesOther Engineering and Technologies

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 292 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf