Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Shear Capacity of a RC Bridge Deck Slab: Comparison between Multilevel Assessment and Field Test
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology .
Luleå University of Technology, Department of Civil, Environmental and Natural Resources Engineering, Structural and Fire Engineering. WSP Sverige AB.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8889-4237
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology.
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology.
Show others and affiliations
2018 (English)In: Journal of Structural Engineering, ISSN 0733-9445, E-ISSN 1943-541X, Vol. 144, no 7, article id 04018081Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

For reinforced concrete (RC) slabs without shear reinforcement, shear and punching can be the governing failure mode at the ultimate limit state if subjected to large concentrated loads. Shear and punching of RC slabs without shear reinforcement has been a challenging problem in assessment based on current standards. To examine a previously developed enhanced analysis approach, this study was conducted by applying a multilevel assessment strategy to a 55-year old RC bridge deck slab subjected to concentrated loads near the main girder in a field failure test. This strategy clearly provides the engineering community a framework for using successively improved structural analysis methods for enhanced assessment in a straightforward manner. The differences between analysis methods at different levels of assessment were discussed regarding one-way shear and punching shear behavior of the slab. The influences of parameters, such as boundary conditions, location of concentrated loads, and shear force distribution, were investigated.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), 2018. Vol. 144, no 7, article id 04018081
National Category
Infrastructure Engineering
Research subject
Structural Engineering
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:ltu:diva-68577DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002076ISI: 000432572000018Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85046273370OAI: oai:DiVA.org:ltu-68577DiVA, id: diva2:1202974
Note

Validerad;2018;Nivå 2;2018-05-02 (andbra)

Available from: 2018-05-02 Created: 2018-05-02 Last updated: 2018-08-16Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records BETA

Bagge, Niklas

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Bagge, Niklas
By organisation
Structural and Fire Engineering
In the same journal
Journal of Structural Engineering
Infrastructure Engineering

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 14 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf