Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Dichotomy of Historicity and Subjective Perception of Complexity in Individuals’ Activity Goal Formation and Decision Outcomes
Luleå University of Technology, Department of Business Administration, Technology and Social Sciences, Human Work Science. University of Ghana Business School, Legon, Accra.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0147-0680
2019 (English)In: Advances in Neuroergonomics and Cognitive Engineering: Proceedings of the AHFE 2018 International Conference on Neuroergonomics and Cognitive Engineering, July 21–25, 2018, Loews Sapphire Falls Resort at Universal Studios, Orlando, Florida USA / [ed] Hasan Ayaz, Lukasz Mazur, Cham: Springer, 2019, p. 265-277Conference paper, Published paper (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

This study examined how the historicity of individuals’ organizational activity and subjective perception of task complexity influence individuals’ activity goal formations, strategies and decision outcomes considerations. The findings showed that conscious goal-directed processes of individuals are influenced by the dichotomy of historicity and their subjective perceptions of task complexity. It is concluded that; when “highest goal” is desired for an impending task, the dichotomous relationship of historicity of the individual’s self-regulation activity and his/her subjective perception of task complexity will have direct influence on both his/her Activity Goal Formation and decision outcome processes, while his/her activity strategies consideration will be directly influenced by only the historicity of his/her self-regulation activity. Also, when “best goal is desired, the dichotomous relationship will directly influence only the individual’s consideration of decision outcomes, while both his/her Activity Goal Formation and strategies consideration will be directly influenced by only the historicity of his/her self-regulation activity.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Cham: Springer, 2019. p. 265-277
Series
Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, ISSN 2194-5357 ; 775
National Category
Production Engineering, Human Work Science and Ergonomics
Research subject
Human Work Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:ltu:diva-69944DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-94866-9_27Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85049688593ISBN: 978-3-319-94865-2 (print)ISBN: 978-3-319-94866-9 (electronic)OAI: oai:DiVA.org:ltu-69944DiVA, id: diva2:1228104
Conference
AHFE 2018 International Conference on Neuroergonomics and Cognitive Engineering, Orlando, Florida, July 21-25 2018
Available from: 2018-06-27 Created: 2018-06-27 Last updated: 2018-08-10Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Sanda, Mohammed-Aminu
By organisation
Human Work Science
Production Engineering, Human Work Science and Ergonomics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
isbn
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
isbn
urn-nbn
Total: 2 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf