Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Comparison of two multimodal pain rehabilitation programmes, in relation to sex and age
Department of Community Medicine and Rehabilitation, Umeå University.
Luleå University of Technology, Department of Health Sciences, Health and Rehabilitation. Department of Research, Region Norrbotten, Luleå.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8001-3001
Department of Community Medicine and Rehabilitation, Umeå University.
Department of Research, Region Norrbotten, Luleå.
Show others and affiliations
2018 (English)In: Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, ISSN 1650-1977, E-ISSN 1651-2081, Vol. 50, no 7, p. 619-628Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Objective: To evaluate patient-reported outcome measures in 2 different multimodal pain rehabilitation programmes and to determine whether outcomes are related to sex or age at 1-year follow-up. Design: Longitudinal retrospective study. Subjects: Patients who had participated in 1 of 2 multimodal pain rehabilitation programmes at 2 rehabilitation centres. A total of 356 women and 83 men, divided into 3 age groups. Methods: Data from the Swedish Quality Registry for Pain Rehabilitation regarding activity and physical functions, pain intensity, health status and emotional functions analysed with descriptive statistics. Results: Significant improvements in activity and physical functions, pain intensity and emotional functions were found in both multimodal pain rehabilitation programmes. Women improved more than men. The older group improved in all emotional functions (depression, anxiety, mental component summary), while the younger group improved only in depression. The intermediate group improved in all variables except anxiety. Conclusion: Patients improved regardless of the design of the multimodal pain rehabilitation programme. Although only small differences were found between men and women and among the 3 age groups in terms of the measured variables, these findings may have clinical relevance and indicate a need to vary the design of the interventions in multimodal rehabilitation programmes for these subgroups.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Foundation Rehabilitation Information , 2018. Vol. 50, no 7, p. 619-628
National Category
Occupational Therapy
Research subject
Occupational therapy
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:ltu:diva-70303DOI: 10.2340/16501977-2352ISI: 000438084000007Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85051041391OAI: oai:DiVA.org:ltu-70303DiVA, id: diva2:1237626
Note

Validerad;2018;Nivå 2;2018-08-09 (andbra)

Available from: 2018-08-09 Created: 2018-08-09 Last updated: 2018-08-14Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records BETA

Kassberg, Ann-Charlotte

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Kassberg, Ann-Charlotte
By organisation
Health and Rehabilitation
In the same journal
Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine
Occupational Therapy

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf