Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Considering landscape in strategic transport planning
Luleå University of Technology, Department of Civil, Environmental and Natural Resources Engineering, Architecture and Water.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9485-7018
Luleå University of Technology, Department of Civil, Environmental and Natural Resources Engineering, Architecture and Water.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8870-2626
Luleå University of Technology, Department of Civil, Environmental and Natural Resources Engineering, Architecture and Water.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6075-9885
2018 (English)In: Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, ISSN 1361-9209, E-ISSN 1879-2340, Vol. 65, p. 396-408Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

The implementation of transport infrastructure plans often has significant impacts on landscapes, especially where new roads and railroads are built. Key decisions regarding the building of new transport infrastructures are often made on a strategic level, where the long-term development of a region is determined, and before the infrastructure project actually begins. In this paper we build on previous advances in Strategic Environmental Assessment theory by linking the process-related issues of the integration of these assessments in general to landscape issues in particular; we use a multiple case study of Swedish transport planning.

Results of this study indicate that the particular planning processes we looked at failed to carry out strategic landscape assessments and integrate landscape assessments in the planning process. We conclude that this can be explained by the flawed procedure of assessing landscape, the unhelpful structuring of SEA reports and by process-related issues. The idea of applying a holistic understanding of landscape, in line with the ELC, was notably absent from the studied cases. The lack of consideration of landscape as a whole can be attributed to poor use of dissipated and fragmented knowledge about landscapes as well as weaknesses in the assessment procedure. Our results indicate that the traditions of EIA are still prevalent in the practice of SEA, despite the fact that SEA theory has moved away from EIA-based methodology to become a tool for integrating environmental concerns into decision-making and for paying close attention to strategic decision processes.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier, 2018. Vol. 65, p. 396-408
Keywords [en]
Landscape, Strategic Environmental Assessment, Strategic planning, Transport planning, European Landscape Convention
National Category
Architectural Engineering
Research subject
Architecture
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:ltu:diva-71091DOI: 10.1016/j.trd.2018.09.001ISI: 000453626000027Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85053815921OAI: oai:DiVA.org:ltu-71091DiVA, id: diva2:1253053
Note

Validerad;2018;Nivå 2;2018-10-03 (svasva)

Available from: 2018-10-03 Created: 2018-10-03 Last updated: 2023-09-05Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. Considering landscape in practices of transport planning
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Considering landscape in practices of transport planning
2020 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

A well-known challenge in planning is for the professionals involved to handle multiple sources ofknowledge and to influence decision-making as a result. This challenge is the main focus of this research and in order to explore it I have directed attention to the integration of knowledge pertaining to landscape in practices of transport planning. In particular, this re­search considers the professionals who contribute to such integration. The aim is to develop and refine our understanding of the challenges and opportunities professionals face when integrating knowledge oflandscape into the practices oftransport planning. A second aim is to contribute to an ongoing discussion within the field of planning theory that addresses the use ofknowledge and the logics underlying practices oftransport planning. At the centre of analysis are the professionals taking part in transport planning and their reflections on their own professional practice. Their perspectives are analysed in relation to the procedural and institutional aspects of their practice and in relation to previous research conceming professional knowledge, within the fields of planning, practice and organisations studies. Findings are presented in three separate studies that focus on different groups of planning professionals working in different parts of Swedish transport planning practice. Study I, investigates strategic planning performed at Regional Development Councils. Study Il sets eyes on the processes of förmal planning and design at the Swedish Transport Ad­ministration (STA) and Study III focuses on planning and design practices taking place at consultancy companies commissioned by the STA. Study IV differs from the other three, as it is primarily a theoretical discussion focusing on the knowledge oflandscapes. Study IV ad­dresses critical issues and challenges regarding the formation ofknowledge about landscapes in spatial planning contexts, based on published landscape research and planning theory.

This research provides situated accounts of professionals' reflections of their own roles, tasks, and practices. The main contribution lies in the details and nuances of their descrip­tions as these deepen our understanding of the complexity of landscape consideration and knowledge integration in transport planning. Participating professionals elucidate essential aspects of challenges in integrating knowledge of landscapes and additionally outline ways to make the interrelation of different types ofknowledge possible. Professionals' discussions provide insights into their perceived opportunities to influence planning decisions and ways they try to safeguard landscapes (rnitigate negative effects and create positive effects) in the layout and design of transport structures.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Luleå: Luleå University of Technology, 2020
Series
Doctoral thesis / Luleå University of Technology 1 jan 1997 → …, ISSN 1402-1544
Keywords
transport planning, knowledge, landscape, planning theory
National Category
Landscape Architecture
Research subject
Architecture
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:ltu:diva-80549 (URN)978-91-7790-636-0 (ISBN)978-91-7790-637-7 (ISBN)
Public defence
2020-10-23, E632, LTU Porsön, Luleå, 10:00 (English)
Opponent
Supervisors
Funder
Swedish Transport Administration, 6626
Available from: 2020-08-25 Created: 2020-08-25 Last updated: 2023-09-05Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Löfgren, SofiaNilsson, Kristina L.Johansson, Charlotta

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Löfgren, SofiaNilsson, Kristina L.Johansson, Charlotta
By organisation
Architecture and Water
In the same journal
Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment
Architectural Engineering

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 281 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf