Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
A case based comparison of the efficiency and innovation potential of integrative and collaborative procurement strategies
Department of Management in the Built Environment, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands.
Luleå University of Technology, Department of Business Administration, Technology and Social Sciences, Business Administration and Industrial Engineering.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1746-2637
Department of Real Estate and Construction Management, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden.
Luleå University of Technology, Department of Civil, Environmental and Natural Resources Engineering, Industrilized and sustainable construction.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9524-4814
2018 (English)In: Proceeding of the 34th Annual ARCOM Conference, ARCOM 2018 / [ed] Gorse, C. & Neilson, C.J., Association of Researchers in Construction Management (ARCOM), 2018, p. 515-524Conference paper, Published paper (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

The purpose of this paper is to investigate and compare in what ways different types of integrative and collaborative procurement strategies may enhance efficiency and innovation in public infrastructure projects. Further, implementation challenges are identified and discussed. Interview-based case studies were performed of ten infrastructure projects in Sweden and the Netherlands. The projects involve four types of collaborative procurement strategies - collaborative Design-Build (DB) contracts, Early Contractor Involvement (ECI) agreements, Design-Build-Maintain (DBM) contracts and Design-Build-Finance-Maintain (DBFM) contracts. The findings indicate that the duration of the collaboration is fundamental in setting the limits for innovation and that early involvement as well as long-term commitments open up for more innovation. Naturally, the potential for increased efficiency is higher than for innovation and also occurs in collaborations with limited duration. These integrated project approaches, however, still appear to be in an early stage of learning. For a public repeat client to realise the full potential of a new strategy, it is important to have a long-term perspective and capabilities to analyse and learn from the experiences.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Association of Researchers in Construction Management (ARCOM), 2018. p. 515-524
National Category
Other Engineering and Technologies not elsewhere specified Construction Management
Research subject
Construction Management and Building Technology; Entrepreneurship and Innovation
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:ltu:diva-72063Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85055672634OAI: oai:DiVA.org:ltu-72063DiVA, id: diva2:1271301
Conference
34th Annual Association of Researchers in Construction Management Conference, ARCOM 2018, Belfast, United Kingdom, 3-5 September 2018
Available from: 2018-12-17 Created: 2018-12-17 Last updated: 2018-12-17Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Scopushttp://www.arcom.ac.uk/-docs/archive/2018-Indexed-Papers.pdf

Authority records BETA

Eriksson, Per-ErikLarsson, Johan

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Eriksson, Per-ErikLarsson, Johan
By organisation
Business Administration and Industrial EngineeringIndustrilized and sustainable construction
Other Engineering and Technologies not elsewhere specifiedConstruction Management

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 85 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf