Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
3D Printed Parts with Honeycomb Internal Pattern by Fused Deposition Modelling: Experimental Characterization and Production Optimization
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Malayer University, Malayer, Iran.
Department of Mechanical Engineering, École de Technologie Supérieure, Montreal, Canada.
Luleå University of Technology, Department of Engineering Sciences and Mathematics, Product and Production Development.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3569-6795
2019 (English)In: Metals and Materials International, ISSN 1598-9623, E-ISSN 2005-4149, Vol. 25, no 5, p. 1312-1325Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

In the present study additive manufacturing of Polylactic acid by fused deposition modeling were investigated based on statistical analysis. The honeycomb internal pattern was employed to build inside of specimens due to its remarkable capability to resist mechanical loads. Simplify 3D was utilized to slice the 3D model and to adjust fixed parameters. Layer thickness, infill percentage, and extruder temperature were considered as controlled variables, while maximum failure load (N), elongation at break (mm), part weight (g), and build time (min) were selected as output responses and analysed by response surface method. Analysis of variance results identified layer thickness as the major controlled variable for all responses. Interaction of infill percentage and extruder temperature had a significant influence on elongation at break and therefore, tough fracture of printed parts. The input parameters were optimized to materialize tow criteria; the first one was to rise maximum failure load and the second was to attain tough fracture and lessen build time and part weight at a time. Optimal solutions were examined by experimental fabrication to evaluate the efficiency of the optimization method. There was a good agreement between empirical results and response surface method predictions which confirmed the reliability of predictive models. The optimal setting to fulfill the first criterion could bring on a specimen with more than 1500 (N) maximum failure load and less than 9 (g) weight.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Springer, 2019. Vol. 25, no 5, p. 1312-1325
Keywords [en]
3D printing, Fused deposition modelling, Mechanical properties, Part weight, Response surface method
National Category
Manufacturing, Surface and Joining Technology
Research subject
Manufacturing Systems Engineering
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:ltu:diva-73719DOI: 10.1007/s12540-019-00272-9ISI: 000480764700019Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85070723837OAI: oai:DiVA.org:ltu-73719DiVA, id: diva2:1306290
Note

Validerad;2019;Nivå 2;2019-08-30 (johcin)

Available from: 2019-04-23 Created: 2019-04-23 Last updated: 2019-08-30Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records BETA

Kaplan, Alexander

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Kaplan, Alexander
By organisation
Product and Production Development
In the same journal
Metals and Materials International
Manufacturing, Surface and Joining Technology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 148 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf