Planned maintenance
A system upgrade is planned for 10/12-2024, at 12:00-13:00. During this time DiVA will be unavailable.
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Picture frame and diagonal compression testing of cross-laminated timber
Luleå University of Technology, Department of Engineering Sciences and Mathematics, Wood Science and Engineering.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0900-5110
Department of Manufacturing and Civil Engineering, Faculty of EngineeringNorwegian University of Science and TechnologyGjøvikNorway.
Luleå University of Technology, Department of Engineering Sciences and Mathematics, Wood Science and Engineering.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4686-4010
Luleå University of Technology, Department of Engineering Sciences and Mathematics, Wood Science and Engineering.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0145-080x
Show others and affiliations
2019 (English)In: Materials and Structures, ISSN 1359-5997, E-ISSN 1871-6873, Vol. 52, no 4, article id 66Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Currently, no appropriate standard exists that describes how to determine the in-plane shear stiffness for cross-laminated timber (CLT) panels, meaning that, there is a lack of appropriate and reliable test methods. In this paper, two gross shear test methods are evaluated: a picture frame test and a diagonal compression test, which are intended to measure the shear stiffness of a whole CLT panel. This evaluation aimed to compare the shear modulus, the amount of compression/tension in the diagonal directions of the panels and the deformations of both sides of the panels. The picture frame test and diagonal compression test provides a bi- and uniaxial pre-stress, respectively. A total of 30 non-edge glued CLT panels were tested, 17 3-layer and 13 5-layer panels. The shear modulus for the 3- and 5-layer non-edge-glued panels were measured as 418 and 466 MPa, respectively, in the picture frame test. In the diagonal compression test, the shear modulus was measured to substantially higher values of 530 and 626 MPa for the 3- and 5-layer panels, respectively. In the picture frame test, panels were equally stretched along one of the diagonals as they were compressed along the other diagonal, which was not the case for panels in the diagonal compression test. The test results also showed that measuring only one side incurs a risk of over- or under-estimating the in-plane shear modulus. Compared with results from the literature, the picture frame test seems to be a more reliable test method than the diagonal compression test.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Springer, 2019. Vol. 52, no 4, article id 66
Keywords [en]
In-plane shear stiffness, Picture frame method, CLT, Shear modulus, Diagonal compression
National Category
Building Technologies Other Mechanical Engineering
Research subject
Wood Science and Engineering
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:ltu:diva-74874DOI: 10.1617/s11527-019-1372-7ISI: 000472221500001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85067616889OAI: oai:DiVA.org:ltu-74874DiVA, id: diva2:1328805
Note

Validerad;2019;Nivå 2;2019-06-24 (svasva)

Available from: 2019-06-23 Created: 2019-06-23 Last updated: 2021-04-15Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. In-Plane Shear Modulus of Cross-Laminated Timber
Open this publication in new window or tab >>In-Plane Shear Modulus of Cross-Laminated Timber
2021 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

Cross-laminated timber (CLT) is a building component used in walls, floors, roofs, or beams in a building. The advantages of using CLT as a building component are, among others, its high load-carrying capability and the possibility of pre-fabrication. The in-plane shear properties of a CLT panel are the in-plane shear modulus and in-plane shear load carrying capacity. This thesis is solely about the in-plane shear modulus and is intended to increase the understanding about the in-plane shear modulus of CLT panels. The in-plane shear modulus is important and there is a need to better understand and estimate its value. The objective of this work was to contribute to the need of finding a suitable test method to measure the in-plane shear modulus of CLT panels and to find factors affecting the in-plane shear modulus.  Three different methods: the picture frame test, the diagonal compression test and the diaphragm shear test, were used in practice and compared to a theoretical test method, the pure shear test. The three methods were compared by conducting experimental tests and by simulating the methods using finite element (FE). Based on the FE simulations, an equation to calculate the shear modulus was created for each test method.  Results from the FE analyses showed that the picture frame test gave results similar to the theoretical pure shear test models. The reason for this result was that the picture frame test is a biaxial testing method. The diagonal compression test and the diaphragm shear test are uniaxial test method. It was also concluded that the picture frame test has a pure shear state in the measured region. The mean error for the in-plane shear modulus equations was estimated, by comparing results from practical testing and FE simulations, to be -2.5%, +12.6% and +11.8% for the picture frame test, diagonal compression test and diaphragm shear test, respectively. The diagonal compression test was the preferred method to use with respect to its simplicity.The factors having an impact on the in-plane shear modulus were found by comparing multiple FE simulations. The results showed that it is possible to increase the in-plane shear modulus by: increasing the odd numbered layers width-to-thickness ratio; decreasing the odd layers thickness ratio of the CLT panels thickness; increasing the number of layers; reducing the gaps between boards; and using alternative main laminate directions. 

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Luleå: Luleå University of Technology, 2021
Series
Doctoral thesis / Luleå University of Technology 1 jan 1997 → …, ISSN 1402-1544
National Category
Other Civil Engineering Building Technologies
Research subject
Wood Science and Engineering
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:ltu:diva-83652 (URN)978-91-7790-823-4 (ISBN)978-91-7790-824-1 (ISBN)
Public defence
2021-06-09, Auditorium A, Skellefteå, 09:00 (English)
Opponent
Supervisors
Available from: 2021-04-15 Created: 2021-04-14 Last updated: 2021-05-26Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Turesson, JonasBjörnfot, AndersBerg, SvenEkevad, Mats

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Turesson, JonasBjörnfot, AndersBerg, SvenEkevad, Mats
By organisation
Wood Science and Engineering
In the same journal
Materials and Structures
Building TechnologiesOther Mechanical Engineering

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 185 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf