System disruptions
We are currently experiencing disruptions on the search portals due to high traffic. We are working to resolve the issue, you may temporarily encounter an error message.
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Dedicated versus mainstreaming approaches in local climate plans in Europe
Faculty of Geo-Information Science and Earth Observation, University of Twente, PO Box 217, 7500 AE Enschede, Netherlands.
Institute of Methodologies for Environmental Analysis, National Research Council of Italy, (CNR-IMAA), C.da S. Loja, 85050, Tito Scalo (PZ), Italy.
Institute of Methodologies for Environmental Analysis, National Research Council of Italy, (CNR-IMAA), C.da S. Loja, 85050, Tito Scalo (PZ), Italy.
Center for Environmental and Sustainability Research (CENSE), NOVA School of Science and Technology - NOVA University Lisbon, 2829-516 Caparica, Portugal.
Show others and affiliations
2019 (English)In: Renewable & sustainable energy reviews, ISSN 1364-0321, E-ISSN 1879-0690, Vol. 112, p. 948-959Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Cities are gaining prominence committing to respond to the threat of climate change, e.g., by developing local climate plans or strategies. However, little is known regarding the approaches and processes of plan development and implementation, or the success and effectiveness of proposed measures. Mainstreaming is regarded as one approach associated with (implementation) success, but the extent of integration of local climate policies and plans in ongoing sectoral and/or development planning is unclear. This paper analyses 885 cities across the 28 European countries to create a first reference baseline on the degree of climate mainstreaming in local climate plans. This will help to compare the benefits of mainstreaming versus dedicated climate plans, looking at policy effectiveness and ultimately delivery of much needed climate change efforts at the city level. All core cities of the European Urban Audit sample were analyzed, and their local climate plans classified as dedicated or mainstreamed in other local policy initiatives. It was found that the degree of mainstreaming is low for mitigation (9% of reviewed cities; 12% of the identified plans) and somewhat higher for adaptation (10% of cities; 29% of plans). In particular horizontal mainstreaming is a major effort for local authorities; an effort that does not necessarily pay off in terms of success of action implementation. This study concludes that climate change issues in local municipalities are best tackled by either, developing a dedicated local climate plan in parallel to a mainstreamed plan or by subsequently developing first the dedicated and later a mainstreaming plan (joint or subsequent “dual track approach”). Cities that currently provide dedicated local climate plans (66% of cities for mitigation; 26% of cities for adaptation) may follow-up with a mainstreaming approach. This promises effective implementation of tangible climate actions as well as subsequent diffusion of climate issues into other local sector policies. The development of only broad sustainability or resilience strategies is seen as critical.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier, 2019. Vol. 112, p. 948-959
Keywords [en]
Local climate policy/ planning, Mitigation, Adaptation, Urban areas/ cities, Urban audit, Europe, EU-28, Mainstreaming, Mitigation/ adaptation tracking, Mitigation/ adaptation stocktaking, Monetoring and evaluation (M&E)
National Category
Energy Engineering
Research subject
Energy Engineering
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:ltu:diva-75263DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2019.05.014ISI: 000474208400063Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85067828774OAI: oai:DiVA.org:ltu-75263DiVA, id: diva2:1336074
Note

Validerad;2019;Nivå 2;2019-07-09 (johcin)

Available from: 2019-07-09 Created: 2019-07-09 Last updated: 2025-01-08Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Krook-Riekkola, Anna

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Krook-Riekkola, Anna
By organisation
Energy Science
In the same journal
Renewable & sustainable energy reviews
Energy Engineering

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 59 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf