Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Factors influencing local communities’ perceptions towards conservation of transboundary wildlife resources: the case of the Great Limpopo Trans-frontier Conservation Area
School of Economics, University of Cape Town, Private Bag, Cape Town, South Africa. Environmental Policy Research Unit (EPRU), University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Department of Political Science, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg. Centre for Collective Action Research, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg.
Department of Political Science, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg. Centre for Collective Action Research, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg.
Department of Political Science, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg. Centre for Collective Action Research, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg.
Show others and affiliations
2019 (English)In: Biodiversity and Conservation, ISSN 0960-3115, E-ISSN 1572-9710, Vol. 28, no 11, p. 2977-3003Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Local communities’ perceptions of protected areas are important determinants of the success of conservation efforts in Southern Africa, as these perceptions affect people’s attitudes and behaviour with respect to conservation. As a result, the involvement of local communities in transboundary wildlife conservation is now viewed as an integral part of regional development initiatives. Building on unique survey data and applying regression analysis, this paper investigates the determinants of the perceptions of local communities around the Great Limpopo Trans-frontier Conservation Area in Zimbabwe and South Africa. Our results illustrate that people perceiving the park as well-managed tend to have more positive perceptions regarding the benefits from the park, rules governing the park, and wildlife conservation in general. Household expertise on resource extraction, in turn, tends to make people more likely to perceive environmental crime as morally acceptable. Furthermore, the results indicate that if people perceive the rules of the park in a negative way, then they are less likely to conserve wildlife. Receiving benefits from the park has a positive impact on people’s perceptions of the rules governing the park, as well as on their perception of wildlife conservation in general, but not on perceptions about environmental crime. Surprisingly, perceived high levels of corruption is positively associated with people’s perception of wildlife benefits and with perceptions of that environmental crime is morally justified. There is also evidence of the role of socioeconomic variables on people’s perceptions towards wildlife. However, unobservable contextual factors could be responsible for explaining part of the variation in people’s perceptions. Our results speak to the literature on large-scale collective action since perceptions of wildlife benefits, corruption, environmental crime, park management and rules governing the parks, all affect local communities’ ability and willingness to self organize. These variables are interesting because they can be influenced by policy through training and awareness campaigns. 

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Springer, 2019. Vol. 28, no 11, p. 2977-3003
Keywords [en]
Perceptions, Attitudes, Behaviour, Collective action, Transfrontier conservation area
National Category
Economics
Research subject
Economics
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:ltu:diva-75357DOI: 10.1007/s10531-019-01809-5ISI: 000476594200014OAI: oai:DiVA.org:ltu-75357DiVA, id: diva2:1338803
Note

Validerad;2019;Nivå 2;2019-08-16 (johcin)

Available from: 2019-07-24 Created: 2019-07-24 Last updated: 2019-08-16Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full text

Authority records BETA

Muchapondwa, Edwin

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Muchapondwa, Edwin
By organisation
Social Sciences
In the same journal
Biodiversity and Conservation
Economics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 2 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf