Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
‘What’s in a name?’ ‘No more than when it's mine own’. Evidence from auditory oddball distraction
Department of Psychology, Umeå University, Umeå. Sweden b School of Psychology, Cardiff University, UK.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5546-3270
Department of Psychology, University of the Balearic Islands, Spain. School of Psychology, University of Western Australia, Australia.
School of Psychology, Cardiff University, UK. School of Psychology, University of Western Australia, Australia.
Department of Psychology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Show others and affiliations
2014 (English)In: Acta Psychologica, ISSN 0001-6918, E-ISSN 1873-6297, Vol. 150, p. 161-6, article id S0001-6918(14)00125-5Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Research of the distractor value of hearing the own name has shown that this self-referring stimulus captures attention in an involuntary fashion and create distraction. The behavioral studies are few and the outcomes are not always clear cut. In this study the distraction by own name compared to a control name was investigated by using a cross-modal oddball task in two experiments. In the first experiment, thirty-nine participants were conducting a computerized categorization task while exposed to, to-be ignored own and matched control names (controlling for familiarity, gender and number of syllables) as unexpected auditory deviant stimulus (12.5% trials for each name category) and a sine wave tone as a standard stimulus (75% of the trials). In the second experiment, another group of thirty-nine participants completed the same task but with the additional deviant stimulus of an irrelevant word added (10% trials for each deviant type and 70% trials with the standard stimulus). Results showed deviant distraction by exposure to both the irrelevant word, own and the control name compared to the standard tone but no differences were found showing that the own name captured attention and distracted the participants more than an irrelevant word or a control name. The results elucidate the role of the own name as a potent auditory distractor and possible limitations with its theoretical significance for general theories of attention are discussed.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2014. Vol. 150, p. 161-6, article id S0001-6918(14)00125-5
Keywords [en]
Attention, Auditory, Distraction, Oddball, Own-name
National Category
Psychology (excluding Applied Psychology) Production Engineering, Human Work Science and Ergonomics
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:ltu:diva-76926DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.05.009PubMedID: 24880979OAI: oai:DiVA.org:ltu-76926DiVA, id: diva2:1373909
Available from: 2019-11-28 Created: 2019-11-28 Last updated: 2019-12-06Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Authority records BETA

Körning-Ljungberg, Jessica

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Körning-Ljungberg, Jessica
In the same journal
Acta Psychologica
Psychology (excluding Applied Psychology)Production Engineering, Human Work Science and Ergonomics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf