Planned maintenance
A system upgrade is planned for 24/9-2024, at 12:00-14:00. During this time DiVA will be unavailable.
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Evaluating the effect on seismicity of a hydraulic fracturing trial using Bayesian data analysis
Luossavaara-Kiirunavaara Aktiebolag (LKAB), Sweden.
Luleå University of Technology, Department of Engineering Sciences and Mathematics, Mathematical Science. Luossavaara-Kiirunavaara Aktiebolag (LKAB), Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6289-4949
2018 (English)In: Caving 2018: Proceedings of the Fourth International Symposium on Block and Sublevel Caving / [ed] Y Potvin, J Jakubec, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, 2018, p. 451-658Conference paper, Published paper (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

During the summer of 2017, a hydraulic fracturing trial was performed in the crown pillar of one of the orebodies in LKAB’s mine in Malmberget. Mucking in the orebody beneath the crown pillar recommenced in September 2017, after being shut down since April 2015. The mucking was shut down in 2015 because a number of large seismic events had caused significant disturbances in the nearby town, with vibration up to 35 mm/s. A research project was started with the final goal to start up production again with less disturbance to the town. Hydraulic fracturing was determined to be an interesting method for improving caveability of the crown pillar, and a trial was set up. The trial consisted of partially fracturing three boreholes drilled from the ground surface into the crown pillar, which is between 550 and 650 m thick at the trial location. Hydraulic fractures were placed with 2.5 m spacing at the bottom 50 m of each hole. As part of the evaluation of the effectiveness of the trial, the seismicity before and after the hydraulic fracturing trial has been compared using standard Bayesian techniques to infer differences. The analysis show a difference in b-value before and after the trial, which is demonstrated by the parameter 𝛥b having a positive value. The 95% high density interval (HDI) of 𝛥b excludes the value of zero, which gives confidence in the conclusion. The difference in b-value depends on the choice of magnitude of completeness, so it is recommended that the analysis is repeated with a method using all recorded events, i.e. using the full dataset.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Australian Centre for Geomechanics, 2018. p. 451-658
Keywords [en]
hydraulic fracturing, seismicity, Bayesian data analysis
National Category
Mathematical Analysis
Research subject
Applied Mathematics
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:ltu:diva-77175DOI: 10.36487/ACG_rep/1815_50_JonssonOAI: oai:DiVA.org:ltu-77175DiVA, id: diva2:1378853
Conference
Fourth International Symposium on Block and Sublevel Caving (Caving 2018), 15-17 October, 2018, Vancouver, Canada
Note

ISBN för värdpublikation: 978-0-9924810-9-4

Available from: 2019-12-15 Created: 2019-12-15 Last updated: 2020-09-10Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full text

Authority records

Martinsson, J

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Martinsson, J
By organisation
Mathematical Science
Mathematical Analysis

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 57 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf