Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Evaluating the effect on seismicity of a hydraulic fracturing trial using Bayesian data analysis
Luleå University of Technology, Department of Engineering Sciences and Mathematics, Mathematical Science.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6289-4949
2018 (English)In: Caving 2018 / [ed] Y Potvin and J Jakubec, 2018, p. 451-658Conference paper, Published paper (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

During the summer of 2017, a hydraulic fracturing trial was performed in the crown pillar of one of the orebodies in LKAB’s mine in Malmberget. Mucking in the orebody beneath the crown pillar recommenced in September 2017, after being shut down since April 2015. The mucking was shut down in 2015 because a number of large seismic events had caused significant disturbances in the nearby town, with vibration up to 35 mm/s. A research project was started with the final goal to start up production again with less disturbance to the town. Hydraulic fracturing was determined to be an interesting method for improving caveability of the crown pillar, and a trial was set up. The trial consisted of partially fracturing three boreholes drilled from the ground surface into the crown pillar, which is between 550 and 650 m thick at the trial location. Hydraulic fractures were placed with 2.5 m spacing at the bottom 50 m of each hole. As part of the evaluation of the effectiveness of the trial, the seismicity before and after the hydraulic fracturing trial has been compared using standard Bayesian techniques to infer differences. The analysis show a difference in b-value before and after the trial, which is demonstrated by the parameter 𝛥b having a positive value. The 95% high density interval (HDI) of 𝛥b excludes the value of zero, which gives confidence in the conclusion. The difference in b-value depends on the choice of magnitude of completeness, so it is recommended that the analysis is repeated with a method using all recorded events, i.e. using the full dataset.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2018. p. 451-658
Keywords [en]
hydraulic fracturing, seismicity, Bayesian data analysis
National Category
Geophysics
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:ltu:diva-77175DOI: 10.36487/ACG_rep/1815_50_JonssonOAI: oai:DiVA.org:ltu-77175DiVA, id: diva2:1378853
Conference
Fourth International Symposium on Block and Sublevel Caving
Available from: 2019-12-15 Created: 2019-12-15 Last updated: 2019-12-15

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full text

Authority records BETA

Martinsson, Jesper

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Martinsson, Jesper
By organisation
Mathematical Science
Geophysics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 10 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf