Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Developing and using a structured, conversation-based intervention for clarifying values and preferences for end-of-life in the advance care planning-naïve Swedish context: Action research within the DöBra research program
Department of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden. Center for Rural Medicine (GMC), Storuman, Sweden. Stockholm Health Care Services (SLSO), Stockholm country council (SLL), Stockholm, Sweden. School of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Luleå University of Technology, Department of Health Sciences, Nursing Care. Department of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0050-4853
Institute for Palliative Medicine, San Diego Hospice, San Diego, California, USA.
Department of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden-Department of Nursing, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
2020 (English)In: Death Studies, ISSN 0748-1187, E-ISSN 1091-7683Article in journal (Refereed) Epub ahead of print
Abstract [en]

Sweden has no systematic advance care planning (ACP), nor legal recognition of end-of-life proxies. We describe our experiences and reflections from a participatory action research process, aiming at developing and initially using a conversation-based, structured ACP approach among community-dwelling, older adults in Sweden. Eco-mapping and DöBra cards were used with 65 people to catalyze discussions on preferences for the end-of-life. We found great individual variation in both Eco-map depictions of social networks and prioritization of the 37 DöBra card items. The DöBra cards were concluded to be a viable tool for stimulating person-centered conversations on preferences for future end-of-life care.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Taylor & Francis, 2020.
National Category
Nursing
Research subject
Nursing
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:ltu:diva-77297DOI: 10.1080/07481187.2019.1701145ISI: 000503630200001PubMedID: 31858889OAI: oai:DiVA.org:ltu-77297DiVA, id: diva2:1382920
Available from: 2020-01-07 Created: 2020-01-07 Last updated: 2020-04-14

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Authority records BETA

Eneslätt, Malin

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Eneslätt, Malin
By organisation
Nursing Care
In the same journal
Death Studies
Nursing

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 33 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf