System disruptions
We are currently experiencing disruptions on the search portals due to high traffic. We are working to resolve the issue, you may temporarily encounter an error message.
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Welfare and forest cover impacts of incentive based conservation: Evidence from Kenyan community forest associations
University of Cape Town, School of Economics, Private Bag Rondebosch, Cape Town, South Africa. EfD-Kenya, School of Economics, University of Nairobi, Kenya. The National Treasury and Planning, Kenya.
Luleå University of Technology, Department of Business Administration, Technology and Social Sciences, Social Sciences. University of Cape Town, School of Economics, Private Bag Rondebosch, Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3400-7548
2020 (English)In: World Development, ISSN 0305-750X, E-ISSN 1873-5991, Vol. 129, article id 104890Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

This paper examines whether offering landless forest-adjacent communities options to grow appropriate food crops inside forest reserves during early stages of reforestation programmes increases incomes of low-income households and conserve forests. We consider the forest cover and household welfare impacts of a unique incentive scheme in Kenya known as the Plantation Establishment and Livelihood Improvement Scheme (PELIS). PELIS seeks to deepen community participation in forestry, and improve the livelihoods of adjacent communities. Using cross sectional data collected from 22 Community Forest Associations and 406 households, we use propensity score matching methods to evaluate the mean impact of the scheme on forest cover and household welfare. We also assess the heterogeneous impacts of the scheme on household welfare using an endogenous quantile treatment effects model. The results show that on average, PELIS has a significant and positive impact on the welfare of participating households (estimated between 15.09% and 28.14%) and on forest cover (between 5.53% and 7.94%). However, the scheme cannot be defended on equity grounds as it has inequitable distributional impacts on household welfare. The scheme raises welfare of groups other than the poorest and marginalized sections of the community. Our observations from the field blame elite capture for this outcome.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier, 2020. Vol. 129, article id 104890
Keywords [en]
Household welfare, Heterogeneity, Selection, Matching, QTE
National Category
Economics
Research subject
Economics
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:ltu:diva-77524DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.104890ISI: 000519652400033Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85078177941OAI: oai:DiVA.org:ltu-77524DiVA, id: diva2:1388637
Note

Validerad;2020;Nivå 2;2020-01-27 (johcin)

Available from: 2020-01-27 Created: 2020-01-27 Last updated: 2020-08-26Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Muchapondwa, Edwin

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Muchapondwa, Edwin
By organisation
Social Sciences
In the same journal
World Development
Economics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 56 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf