Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Sequential decision-making in mining and processing based on geometallurgical inputs
Luleå University of Technology, Department of Civil, Environmental and Natural Resources Engineering, Minerals and Metallurgical Engineering.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4800-9533
Luleå University of Technology, Department of Civil, Environmental and Natural Resources Engineering, Minerals and Metallurgical Engineering.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4861-1903
2020 (English)In: Minerals Engineering, ISSN 0892-6875, E-ISSN 1872-9444, Vol. 149, article id 106262Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Geometallurgy as a multi-disciplinary field has been applied at various levels in different operations. By linking the ore performance in mineral beneficiation processes to the ore block model, it supports estimating the value of a block before it is mined. Efforts in the classification of the ore into geometallurgical classes have led to a better understanding of the entire value chain. While classification provides a convenient tool for forecasting and visualization purposes, it simplifies the actual complexity of an ore body. In mining and process planning, sequential decisions are made to maximize an objective function or equivalently minimize a regret function. Using available information from geology or metallurgical test work, an optimal strategy can be found using tools from the machine learning community.

In this study, a framework based on machine learning to maximize the use of such classifications for sequential decision-making is proposed. The concepts of reinforcement learning and bandit algorithms, offer powerful tools to explore and exploit different optimization strategies. In certain cases, theoretical guarantees about the performance of given methods can be obtained by regret bounds.

Based on existing models of a porphyry copper deposit and an iron ore deposit, this study presents a methodology and different available algorithms to maximize an objective function that depends on a high number of variables and in the presence of noise or uncertainty in the models. Different numerical experiments provide a basis for discussion and comparison to human decisions. The hypotheses relative to each algorithm are discussed in relation to the mineral processing models.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier, 2020. Vol. 149, article id 106262
Keywords [en]
Geometallurgy, Optimization, Decision-making, Data integration, Process simulation, Digitalization
National Category
Metallurgy and Metallic Materials
Research subject
Mineral Processing
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:ltu:diva-77841DOI: 10.1016/j.mineng.2020.106262ISI: 000523730500022Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85079342353OAI: oai:DiVA.org:ltu-77841DiVA, id: diva2:1395952
Note

Validerad;2020;Nivå 2;2020-02-25 (alebob)

Available from: 2020-02-25 Created: 2020-02-25 Last updated: 2023-12-19Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Koch, Pierre-HenriRosenkranz, Jan

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Koch, Pierre-HenriRosenkranz, Jan
By organisation
Minerals and Metallurgical Engineering
In the same journal
Minerals Engineering
Metallurgy and Metallic Materials

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 122 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf