Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Determinants of successful collective management of forest resources: Evidence from Kenyan Community Forest Associations
School of Economics, University of Cape Town, Private Bag Rondebosch, Cape Town, South Africa. EfD-Kenya/School of Economics, University of Nairobi Kenya, Nairobi, Kenya. The National Treasury and Planning, Nairobi, Kenya.
Luleå University of Technology, Department of Business Administration, Technology and Social Sciences, Social Sciences.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3400-7548
2020 (English)In: Forest Policy and Economics, ISSN 1389-9341, E-ISSN 1872-7050, Vol. 113, article id 102122Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

The collective participation of local communities in the management and utilization of forest resources is now widely accepted as a possible solution to the failure of centralized, top-down approaches to forest conservation. Under such initiatives, communities in Kenya have organized themselves into Community Forest Associations (CFAs). Despite the proliferation of CFAs, forest conservation outcomes have been mixed. Little is known about the factors that influence the success of collective action in forest conservation. Using data from 518 households and 22 CFAs within the Mau forest conservancy, this study employed regression techniques to analyze factors that influence household participation in CFA activities. Further, the study investigated the determinants of successful collective action, as measured by the percentage of forest cover and the number of reported cases of vandalism of forest resources. The relationship between household participation and success of collective action was also established. Collective action is more successful where household participation is high, the associations are initiated by the communities themselves, the associations interact frequently with government departments, and the forest cover is low, among other factors. The factors that influence the level of household participation are also identified.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier, 2020. Vol. 113, article id 102122
Keywords [en]
PFM, Collective action, Participation, CFAs
National Category
Economics
Research subject
Economics
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:ltu:diva-77954DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2020.102122ISI: 000519530000006Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85080058914OAI: oai:DiVA.org:ltu-77954DiVA, id: diva2:1411569
Note

Validerad;2020;Nivå 2;2020-03-04 (johcin)

Available from: 2020-03-04 Created: 2020-03-04 Last updated: 2020-08-26Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Muchapondwa, Edwin

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Muchapondwa, Edwin
By organisation
Social Sciences
In the same journal
Forest Policy and Economics
Economics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 112 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf