System disruptions
We are currently experiencing disruptions on the search portals due to high traffic. We are working to resolve the issue, you may temporarily encounter an error message.
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Designing with differences, cross-disciplinary collaboration in transport infrastructure planning and design
Luleå University of Technology, Department of Civil, Environmental and Natural Resources Engineering, Architecture and Water.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9485-7018
2020 (English)In: Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, E-ISSN 2590-1982, Vol. 4, article id 100106Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

The study explores enablers and barriers of collaborative planning and design work in transport infrastructure planning projects, drawing upon five cases of projects in Sweden. The study apply a set of theoretical lenses complied of previous research focusing professional knowledge and co-production in planning and design practices, and research revolving around the concept of boundary objects in studies of collaborative work. The study provides insights into the mechanisms of practitioners' learning across professional boundaries: what they learn from each other, how they learn, and how the learning facilitates collaborative work. The results show that disciplinary barriers can be bridged through both individual efforts and project management strategies.

This study shed light a set of enablers on individual level including; 1) a capacity to change focus between solving tasks within the remit of one's own discipline and jointly solving tasks together with professionals representing other disciplines; 2) curiosity and interest other professional perspectives; 3) willingness to learn from other professionals; and 4) motivation to engage in cross-disciplinary design processes. Project management is proposed to enable collaboration by; 1) opening up discussions about reasons and motives for collaborative work; 2) opening up discussions about strategies for collaborative processes; 3) promoting and facilitating learning processes among project participants, 4) coordinating meetings and activities for collaboration, and 5) facilitating deliberative dialogues at project meetings in which different types of knowledge can be put forth and interrelated.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier, 2020. Vol. 4, article id 100106
Keywords [en]
Transport infrastructure planning, Cross-disciplinary collaboration, Landscape architects, Engineers, Boundary objects, Professional knowledge
National Category
Architectural Engineering
Research subject
Architecture
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:ltu:diva-78231DOI: 10.1016/j.trip.2020.100106ISI: 001094881300001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85081887789OAI: oai:DiVA.org:ltu-78231DiVA, id: diva2:1417366
Note

Validerad;2020;Nivå 1;2020-05-26 (alebob)

Available from: 2020-03-27 Created: 2020-03-27 Last updated: 2024-08-30Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. Considering landscape in practices of transport planning
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Considering landscape in practices of transport planning
2020 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

A well-known challenge in planning is for the professionals involved to handle multiple sources ofknowledge and to influence decision-making as a result. This challenge is the main focus of this research and in order to explore it I have directed attention to the integration of knowledge pertaining to landscape in practices of transport planning. In particular, this re­search considers the professionals who contribute to such integration. The aim is to develop and refine our understanding of the challenges and opportunities professionals face when integrating knowledge oflandscape into the practices oftransport planning. A second aim is to contribute to an ongoing discussion within the field of planning theory that addresses the use ofknowledge and the logics underlying practices oftransport planning. At the centre of analysis are the professionals taking part in transport planning and their reflections on their own professional practice. Their perspectives are analysed in relation to the procedural and institutional aspects of their practice and in relation to previous research conceming professional knowledge, within the fields of planning, practice and organisations studies. Findings are presented in three separate studies that focus on different groups of planning professionals working in different parts of Swedish transport planning practice. Study I, investigates strategic planning performed at Regional Development Councils. Study Il sets eyes on the processes of förmal planning and design at the Swedish Transport Ad­ministration (STA) and Study III focuses on planning and design practices taking place at consultancy companies commissioned by the STA. Study IV differs from the other three, as it is primarily a theoretical discussion focusing on the knowledge oflandscapes. Study IV ad­dresses critical issues and challenges regarding the formation ofknowledge about landscapes in spatial planning contexts, based on published landscape research and planning theory.

This research provides situated accounts of professionals' reflections of their own roles, tasks, and practices. The main contribution lies in the details and nuances of their descrip­tions as these deepen our understanding of the complexity of landscape consideration and knowledge integration in transport planning. Participating professionals elucidate essential aspects of challenges in integrating knowledge of landscapes and additionally outline ways to make the interrelation of different types ofknowledge possible. Professionals' discussions provide insights into their perceived opportunities to influence planning decisions and ways they try to safeguard landscapes (rnitigate negative effects and create positive effects) in the layout and design of transport structures.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Luleå: Luleå University of Technology, 2020
Series
Doctoral thesis / Luleå University of Technology 1 jan 1997 → …, ISSN 1402-1544
Keywords
transport planning, knowledge, landscape, planning theory
National Category
Landscape Architecture
Research subject
Architecture
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:ltu:diva-80549 (URN)978-91-7790-636-0 (ISBN)978-91-7790-637-7 (ISBN)
Public defence
2020-10-23, E632, LTU Porsön, Luleå, 10:00 (English)
Opponent
Supervisors
Funder
Swedish Transport Administration, 6626
Available from: 2020-08-25 Created: 2020-08-25 Last updated: 2025-02-21Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Löfgren, Sofia

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Löfgren, Sofia
By organisation
Architecture and Water
In the same journal
Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives
Architectural Engineering

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 147 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf