Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Quantifying the sources of uncertainty when calculating the limiting flux in secondary settling tanks using iCFD
Department of Environmental Engineering, Technical University of Denmark (DTU), Miljøvej 113, 2800 Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark.
Department of Environmental Engineering, Technical University of Denmark (DTU), Miljøvej 113, 2800 Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark.
Luleå University of Technology, Department of Business Administration, Technology and Social Sciences, Business Administration and Industrial Engineering. Department of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science, Technical University of Denmark, Richard Petersens Plads, Building 321, 2800 Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4222-9631
Department of Environmental Engineering, Technical University of Denmark (DTU), Miljøvej 113, 2800 Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark; Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Bath, Claverton Down, Bath BA2 7AY, UK.
2020 (English)In: Water Science and Technology, ISSN 0273-1223, E-ISSN 1996-9732, Vol. 81, no 2, p. 241-252Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Solids-flux theory (SFT) and state-point analysis (SPA) are used for the design, operation and control of secondary settling tanks (SSTs). The objectives of this study were to assess uncertainties, propagating from flow and solids loading boundary conditions as well as compression settling behaviour to the calculation of the limiting flux (JL) and the limiting solids concentration (XL). The interpreted computational fluid dynamics (iCFD) simulation model was used to predict one-dimensional local concentrations and limiting solids fluxes as a function of loading and design boundary conditions. A two-level fractional factorial design of experiments was used to infer the relative significance of factors unaccounted for in conventional SPA. To move away from using semi-arbitrary safety factors, a systematic approach was proposed to calculate the maximum SST capacity by employing a factor of 23% and a regression meta-model to correct values of JL and XL, respectively – critical for abating hydraulic effects under wet-weather flow conditions.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
IWA Publishing, 2020. Vol. 81, no 2, p. 241-252
Keywords [en]
computational fluid dynamics, interpreted computational fluid dynamics model (iCFD), one-dimensional advection dispersion model, secondary settling tank, solids-flux theory, statistical factor screening
National Category
Reliability and Maintenance
Research subject
Quality Technology and Logistics
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:ltu:diva-78711DOI: 10.2166/wst.2020.090ISI: 000529870200005PubMedID: 32333657Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85084030245OAI: oai:DiVA.org:ltu-78711DiVA, id: diva2:1427039
Note

Validerad;2020;Nivå 2;2020-04-28 (alebob)

Available from: 2020-04-28 Created: 2020-04-28 Last updated: 2025-04-17Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Kulahci, Murat

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Kulahci, Murat
By organisation
Business Administration and Industrial Engineering
In the same journal
Water Science and Technology
Reliability and Maintenance

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 41 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf