Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Optimal Operational Decision Making of Manufacturers and Authorized Remanufacturers with Patent Licensing under Carbon Cap-and-Trade Regulations
Luleå University of Technology, Department of Business Administration, Technology and Social Sciences, Business Administration and Industrial Engineering. School of Management, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China; School of Economics and Management, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou, China.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4637-0376
School of Management, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Sino-US Global Logistics Institute, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Luleå University of Technology, Department of Business Administration, Technology and Social Sciences, Business Administration and Industrial Engineering. School of Economics and Management, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou, China.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6734-249X
Show others and affiliations
2020 (English)In: Complexity, ISSN 1076-2787, E-ISSN 1099-0526, Vol. 2020, article id 1864641Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Constrained by production capacity and the pressure to reduce emissions, many original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) authorize third-party remanufacturers (TPRs) to remanufacture patented products. We investigate the operational decisions of OEMs and authorized TPRs under carbon cap-and-trade regulations in a two-echelon supply chain. We first formulate an operational decision model for OEMs before a TPR enters. Then, for the cases of centralized and decentralized decision making, we formulate an operational decision-making model for the TPR and, subsequently, establish one for the OEM after the TPR enters. We further analyze the effects of carbon emissions cap, trading price of carbon permits, yield rate, and consumer willingness to pay (WTP) on optimal decisions. Our results indicate: whether TPRs accept authorization remanufacturing depending on the ratio of carbon emissions cap to carbon emissions for producing per remanufactured product; royalty rate is negatively affected by trading price of carbon permits and per remanufactured product’ carbon emissions other than that for per new product, and can offset the threat caused by TPRs; the implementation of carbon cap-and-trade regulations causes OEMs to charge TPRs lower royalty rate; centralized decision making increases the total profit of the supply chain and delivers superior environmental benefits. As yield rate and WTP increase, the total profit increases, increasingly sensitive to WTP.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Hindawi Publishing Corporation, 2020. Vol. 2020, article id 1864641
National Category
Reliability and Maintenance
Research subject
Quality Technology and Logistics
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:ltu:diva-80597DOI: 10.1155/2020/1864641ISI: 000559118200002Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85089306844OAI: oai:DiVA.org:ltu-80597DiVA, id: diva2:1461828
Note

Validerad;2020;Nivå 2;2020-08-27 (johcin)

Available from: 2020-08-27 Created: 2020-08-27 Last updated: 2025-04-17Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Liu, BiyuMigdalas, Athanasios

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Liu, BiyuYang, HaidongMigdalas, Athanasios
By organisation
Business Administration and Industrial Engineering
In the same journal
Complexity
Reliability and Maintenance

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 71 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf