Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Biological and environmental predictors of heterogeneity in neurocognitive ageing: Evidence from Betula and other longitudinal studies
Department of Radiation Sciences, Umeå University, S-90187 Umeå, Sweden. Umeå Center for Functional Brain Imaging (UFBI), Umeå University, S-90187 Umeå, Sweden. Department of Integrative Medical Biology, Umeå University, S-90187 Umeå, Sweden.
Department of Radiation Sciences, Umeå University, S-90187 Umeå, Sweden. Umeå Center for Functional Brain Imaging (UFBI), Umeå University, S-90187 Umeå, Sweden. Danish Research Centre for Magnetic Resonance (DRCMR), Centre for Functional and Diagnostic Imaging and Research, Copenhagen University Hospital Hvidovre, Denmark. Institute of Sports Medicine Copenhagen (ISMC), Copenhagen University Hospital Bispebjerg, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Luleå University of Technology, Department of Business Administration, Technology and Social Sciences, Humans and technology.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2709-9966
Department of Psychology, Umeå University, S-90187 Umeå, Sweden.
Show others and affiliations
2020 (English)In: Ageing Research Reviews, ISSN 1568-1637, E-ISSN 1872-9649, Vol. 64, article id 101184Article, review/survey (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Individual differences in cognitive performance increase with advancing age, reflecting marked cognitive changes in some individuals along with little or no change in others. Genetic and lifestyle factors are assumed to influence cognitive performance in aging by affecting the magnitude and extent of age-related brain changes (i.e., brain maintenance or atrophy), as well as the ability to recruit compensatory processes. The purpose of this review is to present findings from the Betula study and other longitudinal studies, with a focus on clarifying the role of key biological and environmental factors assumed to underlie individual differences in brain and cognitive aging. We discuss the vital importance of sampling, analytic methods, consideration of non-ignorable dropout, and related issues for valid conclusions on factors that influence healthy neurocognitive aging.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier, 2020. Vol. 64, article id 101184
Keywords [en]
ageing, memory, longitudinal, brain, genetics, lifestyle, brain maintenance
National Category
Production Engineering, Human Work Science and Ergonomics
Research subject
Engineering Psychology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:ltu:diva-80972DOI: 10.1016/j.arr.2020.101184ISI: 000595935300003PubMedID: 32992046Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85092710312OAI: oai:DiVA.org:ltu-80972DiVA, id: diva2:1471476
Note

Validerad;2020;Nivå 2;2020-10-27 (alebob)

Available from: 2020-09-29 Created: 2020-09-29 Last updated: 2021-01-11Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Eriksson Sörman, DanielLjungberg, Jessica K.

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Eriksson Sörman, DanielLjungberg, Jessica K.
By organisation
Humans and technology
In the same journal
Ageing Research Reviews
Production Engineering, Human Work Science and Ergonomics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 76 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf