Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Influence of laminate direction and glue area on in-plane shear modulus of cross-laminated timber
Luleå University of Technology, Department of Engineering Sciences and Mathematics, Wood Science and Engineering.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0900-5110
Luleå University of Technology, Department of Engineering Sciences and Mathematics, Wood Science and Engineering.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0687-9154
Luleå University of Technology, Department of Engineering Sciences and Mathematics, Wood Science and Engineering.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4686-4010
Luleå University of Technology, Department of Engineering Sciences and Mathematics, Wood Science and Engineering.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0145-080x
2020 (English)In: SN Applied Sciences, ISSN 2523-3963, E-ISSN 2523-3971, Vol. 2, no 12, article id 2126Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

The use of cross-laminated timber (CLT) in constructing tall buildings has increased. So, it has become crucial to get a higher in-plane stiffness in CLT panels. One way of increasing the shear modulus, G, for CLT panels can be by alternating the layers to other angles than the traditional 0° and 90°. The diagonal compression test can be used to measure the shear stiffness from which G is calculated. A general equation for calculating the G value for the CLT panels tested in the diagonal compression test was established and verified by tests, finite element simulations and external data. The equation was created from finite element simulations of full-scale CLT walls. By this equation, the influence on the G value was a factor of 2.8 and 2.0 by alternating the main laminate direction of the mid layer from the traditional 90° to 45° and 30°, respectively. From practical tests, these increases were measured to 2.9 and 1.8, respectively. Another influence on the G value was studied by the reduction of the glue area between the layers. It was shown that the pattern of the contact area was more important than the size of the contact area.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Springer, 2020. Vol. 2, no 12, article id 2126
Keywords [en]
Cross-laminated timber, Diagonal compression test, Laminate direction, Shear modulus, Finite elements, Glue
National Category
Wood Science
Research subject
Wood Science and Engineering
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:ltu:diva-81839DOI: 10.1007/s42452-020-03918-1ISI: 000596701800011Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85100752571OAI: oai:DiVA.org:ltu-81839DiVA, id: diva2:1506523
Funder
Interreg Nord
Note

Validerad;2021;Nivå 2;2021-01-21 (alebob)

Available from: 2020-12-03 Created: 2020-12-03 Last updated: 2023-03-28Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. In-Plane Shear Modulus of Cross-Laminated Timber
Open this publication in new window or tab >>In-Plane Shear Modulus of Cross-Laminated Timber
2021 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

Cross-laminated timber (CLT) is a building component used in walls, floors, roofs, or beams in a building. The advantages of using CLT as a building component are, among others, its high load-carrying capability and the possibility of pre-fabrication. The in-plane shear properties of a CLT panel are the in-plane shear modulus and in-plane shear load carrying capacity. This thesis is solely about the in-plane shear modulus and is intended to increase the understanding about the in-plane shear modulus of CLT panels. The in-plane shear modulus is important and there is a need to better understand and estimate its value. The objective of this work was to contribute to the need of finding a suitable test method to measure the in-plane shear modulus of CLT panels and to find factors affecting the in-plane shear modulus.  Three different methods: the picture frame test, the diagonal compression test and the diaphragm shear test, were used in practice and compared to a theoretical test method, the pure shear test. The three methods were compared by conducting experimental tests and by simulating the methods using finite element (FE). Based on the FE simulations, an equation to calculate the shear modulus was created for each test method.  Results from the FE analyses showed that the picture frame test gave results similar to the theoretical pure shear test models. The reason for this result was that the picture frame test is a biaxial testing method. The diagonal compression test and the diaphragm shear test are uniaxial test method. It was also concluded that the picture frame test has a pure shear state in the measured region. The mean error for the in-plane shear modulus equations was estimated, by comparing results from practical testing and FE simulations, to be -2.5%, +12.6% and +11.8% for the picture frame test, diagonal compression test and diaphragm shear test, respectively. The diagonal compression test was the preferred method to use with respect to its simplicity.The factors having an impact on the in-plane shear modulus were found by comparing multiple FE simulations. The results showed that it is possible to increase the in-plane shear modulus by: increasing the odd numbered layers width-to-thickness ratio; decreasing the odd layers thickness ratio of the CLT panels thickness; increasing the number of layers; reducing the gaps between boards; and using alternative main laminate directions. 

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Luleå: Luleå University of Technology, 2021
Series
Doctoral thesis / Luleå University of Technology 1 jan 1997 → …, ISSN 1402-1544
National Category
Other Civil Engineering Building Technologies
Research subject
Wood Science and Engineering
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:ltu:diva-83652 (URN)978-91-7790-823-4 (ISBN)978-91-7790-824-1 (ISBN)
Public defence
2021-06-09, Auditorium A, Skellefteå, 09:00 (English)
Opponent
Supervisors
Available from: 2021-04-15 Created: 2021-04-14 Last updated: 2021-05-26Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Turesson, JonasSharifi, ZahraBerg, SvenEkevad, Mats

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Turesson, JonasSharifi, ZahraBerg, SvenEkevad, Mats
By organisation
Wood Science and Engineering
In the same journal
SN Applied Sciences
Wood Science

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 227 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf